Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20336080›Full record

ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2010

Monitoring technologies in the neonatal intensive care unit: implications for the detection of necrotizing enterocolitis.

S Oh, C Young, N Gravenstein, S Islam, J Neu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Calprotectin levels in necrotizing enterocolitis: a systematic review of the literature.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Abnormal heart rate characteristics before clinical diagnosis of necrotizing enterocolitis.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2013
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Necrotizing enterocolitis: It's not all in the gut.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Necrotizing enterocolitis.The New England journal of medicine · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S OhDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
C Young
N Gravenstein
S Islam
J Neu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Necrotizing enterocolitis is the most common and fulminant gastrointestinal disease affecting neonates. Its pathogenesis is heterogeneous and not clearly understood. Early detection could prevent some of the devastating consequences of this disease, but currently there is no noninvasive method of reliable early-stage detection. Here, we review various noninvasive monitoring technologies that have already been employed or show promise for early detection. Each method may have an important role after its technical difficulties are resolved. These are discussed in detail as they relate to various aspects of the putative pathophysiology of this devastating disease.

Indexed as

Enterocolitis, NecrotizingCritical PathwaysEarly DiagnosisHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornIntensive Care, NeonatalIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMonitoring, Physiologic

Identifiers

PMID20336080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.