Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20335213›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2010

Socially induced brain development in a facultatively eusocial sweat bee Megalopta genalis (Halictidae).

Adam R Smith, Marc A Seid, Lissette C Jiménez, William T Wcislo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evolution of neurometabolic frugality in harvester ants.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Experience-dependent plasticity in the olfactory system ofFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Brain evolution in social insects: advocating for the comparative approach.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2019
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. An intraspecific appraisal of the social intelligence hypothesis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  18. Why are there so many explanations for primate brain evolution?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  19. Sensory and cognitive adaptations to social living in insect societies.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adam R SmithSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 0843-03092, Balboa, Republic of Panama. arsmith2@gmail.com
Marc A Seid
Lissette C Jiménez
William T Wcislo
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute · PA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Changes in the relative size of brain regions are often dependent on experience and environmental stimulation, which includes an animal's social environment. Some studies suggest that social interactions are cognitively demanding, and have examined predictions that the evolution of sociality led to the evolution of larger brains. Previous studies have compared species with different social organizations or different groups within obligately social species. Here, we report the first intraspecific study to examine how social experience shapes brain volume using a species with facultatively eusocial or solitary behaviour, the sweat bee Megalopta genalis. Serial histological sections were used to reconstruct and measure the volume of brain areas of bees behaving as social reproductives, social workers, solitary reproductives or 1-day-old bees that are undifferentiated with respect to the social phenotype. Social reproductives showed increased development of the mushroom body (an area of the insect brain associated with sensory integration and learning) relative to social workers and solitary reproductives. The gross neuroanatomy of young bees is developmentally similar to the advanced eusocial species previously studied, despite vast differences in colony size and social organization. Our results suggest that the transition from solitary to social behaviour is associated with modified brain development, and that maintaining dominance, rather than sociality per se, leads to increased mushroom body development, even in the smallest social groups possible (i.e. groups with two bees). Such results suggest that capabilities to navigate the complexities of social life may be a factor shaping brain evolution in some social insects, as for some vertebrates.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionHierarchy, SocialSocial BehaviorAge FactorsAnimalsBeesBody Weights and MeasuresBrainFemaleHistological TechniquesOrgan SizePanama

Identifiers

PMID20335213
PMCPMC2880158
OpenAlexW2146736550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.