ArticleBMC research notes2010
Methodology for the development of a taxonomy and toolkit to evaluate health-related habits and lifestyle (eVITAL).
Article in BMC research notes, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- The CATALYTIC tool to assess feasibility of implementing evidence-based interventions for cardiovascular diseases in 46 low- and middle-income countries: survey outcomes and tool reliability testing.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Development of a Healthy Lifestyle Assessment Toolkit for the General Public.Frontiers in medicine · 2019Article
- Basic concepts in the taxonomy of health-related behaviors, habits and lifestyle.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2013Article
- eVITAL: a preliminary taxonomy and electronic toolkit of health-related habits and lifestyle.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2012Article
- The WHO construct of health-related functioning (HrF) and its implications for health policy.BMC public health · 2011Review
- A preliminary taxonomy and a standard knowledge base for mental-health system indicators in Spain.International journal of mental health systems · 2010Article
- Measuring implementation outcomes: An updated systematic review of measures' psychometric properties.Implementation research and practiceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic diseases cause an ever-increasing percentage of morbidity and mortality, but many have modifiable risk factors. Many behaviors that predispose or protect an individual to chronic disease are interrelated, and therefore are best approached using an integrated model of health and the longevity paradigm, using years lived without disability as the endpoint.
findingsThis study used a 4-phase mixed qualitative design to create a taxonomy and related online toolkit for the evaluation of health-related habits. Core members of a working group conducted a literature review and created a framing document that defined relevant constructs. This document was revised, first by a working group and then by a series of multidisciplinary expert groups. The working group and expert panels also designed a systematic evaluation of health behaviors and risks, which was computerized and evaluated for feasibility. A demonstration study of the toolkit was performed in 11 healthy volunteers. DISCUSSION: In this protocol, we used forms of the community intelligence approach, including frame analysis, feasibility, and demonstration, to develop a clinical taxonomy and an online toolkit with standardized procedures for screening and evaluation of multiple domains of health, with a focus on longevity and the goal of integrating the toolkit into routine clinical practice.
trial registrationIMSERSO registry 200700012672.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.