Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20333683›Full record

ArticleJournal of cellular physiology2010

SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling enzyme ATPases promote cell proliferation in normal mammary epithelial cells.

Nathalie Cohet, Kathleen M Stewart, Rajini Mudhasani, Ananthi J Asirvatham, Chandrashekara Mallappa, Karen M Imbalzano, Valerie M Weaver, Anthony N Imbalzano, Jeffrey A Nickerson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cellular physiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nathalie CohetDepartment of Cell Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01655, USA.
Kathleen M Stewart
Rajini Mudhasani
Ananthi J Asirvatham
Chandrashekara Mallappa
Karen M Imbalzano
Valerie M Weaver
Anthony N Imbalzano
Jeffrey A Nickerson
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

SUBNUCLEAR TARGETING OF TRANSCRIPTION FACTORSP01CA082834 · NCI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI STEIN, GARY S. · 2001 to 2015
$18.4M
PILOT AND FEASIBILITY PROGRAMP30DK032520 · NIDDK · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI CZECH, MICHAEL P · 1986 to 2010
$14.6M
Collagen remodeling and tumor progressionR01CA138818 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI WEAVER, VALERIE MARIE · 2010 to 2014
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA082834NCI NIH HHS P01 CA82834NCI NIH HHS R01 CA138818NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK032520NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK32520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ATPase subunits of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling enzymes, Brahma (BRM) and Brahma-related gene 1 (BRG1), can induce cell cycle arrest in BRM and BRG1 deficient tumor cell lines, and mice heterozygous for Brg1 are pre-disposed to breast tumors, implicating loss of BRG1 as a mechanism for unregulated cell proliferation. To test the hypothesis that loss of BRG1 can contribute to breast cancer, we utilized RNA interference to reduce the amounts of BRM or BRG1 protein in the nonmalignant mammary epithelial cell line, MCF-10A. When grown in reconstituted basement membrane (rBM), these cells develop into acini that resemble the lobes of normal breast tissue. Contrary to expectations, knockdown of either BRM or BRG1 resulted in an inhibition of cell proliferation in monolayer cultures. This inhibition was strikingly enhanced in three-dimensional rBM culture, although some BRM-depleted cells were later able to resume proliferation. Cells did not arrest in any specific stage of the cell cycle; instead, the cell cycle length increased by approximately 50%. Thus, SWI/SNF ATPases promote cell cycle progression in nonmalignant mammary epithelial cells.

Indexed as

Chromatin Assembly and DisassemblyAdenosine TriphosphatasesBasement MembraneCell CycleCell LineCell ProliferationDNA HelicasesDoxycyclineEpithelial CellsFemaleGene Knockdown TechniquesHumansMammary Glands, HumanNuclear ProteinsProtein SubunitsRNA, Small InterferingAdenosine TriphosphatasesDNA HelicasesDoxycyclinegrowth arrest specific transcript 5Nuclear ProteinsProtein SubunitsRNA, Small InterferingRNA, Small NucleolarSMARCA2 protein, humanSMARCA4 protein, humanTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID20333683
PMCPMC3320666
OpenAlexW2077664235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.