Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20333381›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2010

Risk-adapted anastomosis for partial pancreaticoduodenectomy reduces the risk of pancreatic fistula: a pilot study.

Marco Niedergethmann, Niloufar Dusch, Rizky Widyaningsih, Christel Weiss, Peter Kienle, Stefan Post

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized study.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2014
    Trial
  2. Randomized controlled single-center trial comparing pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after partial pancreatoduodenectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2012
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. [Pancreaticogastrostomy: when and how?]Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2017
    Review
  6. Modified technique of pancreaticogastrostomy for soft pancreas with two continuous hemstitch sutures: a single-center prospective study.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2013
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marco NiedergethmannDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Mannheim, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, 68135, Mannheim, Germany. marco.niedergethmann@umm.de
Niloufar Dusch
Rizky Widyaningsih
Christel Weiss
Peter Kienle
Stefan Post
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEUniversity Medical Centre Mannheim · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPancreatic fistula (PF) is the main cause of postoperative morbidity and mortality after pancreatectomy. Two reasons for PF are a "soft" pancreatic texture and a narrow pancreatic duct (high-risk gland). Pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) may lead to a higher fistula rate in such glands. In the literature there are no data available on risk-adapted assignment of pancreatogastrostomy (PG) in a high-risk gland. Therefore, an observational pilot study was conducted to address this issue.

methodsSince January 2007 the concept of a "risk-adapted pancreatic anastomosis" (RAP) was introduced (PG for high-risk glands). The PF rate, morbidity, and mortality during this period (January 2007 to December 2008, n = 74) were compared to those between January 2004 and December 2006 (n = 119, only PJ). PF was defined according to the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery.

resultsThrough RAP the PF rate was reduced from 22 to 11% (P = 0.0503). Grade C PF rate was reduced from 6.7 to 1.4% (P = 0.1569) and grade A PF from 6 to 1.4% (P = 0.2537). The PF-associated mortality was reduced from 3.4 to 1.4%. PG revealed a PF rate of 7% and PJ accounted for 19% of PFs (P = 0.1765). There was no incidence of grade C PF following PG. The incidence of intraluminal hemorrhage (P = 0.0422) and delayed gastric emptying (P = 0.0572) was higher following PG.

conclusionsThe rate of PF could be significantly reduced with the use of RAP. One should be cautious about the indication for PG, since it is associated with a higher rate of intraluminal hemorrhage and delayed gastric emptying. There are no long-term results on PG with respect to its durability and function. A general recommendation for its use cannot currently be made.

Indexed as

PancreaticojejunostomySuture TechniquesAdenocarcinomaAmpulla of VaterAnastomosis, SurgicalBile Duct NeoplasmsCommon Bile Duct NeoplasmsGastrostomyHumansPancreatic FistulaPancreatic NeoplasmsPancreatitis, ChronicPilot Projects

Identifiers

PMID20333381
OpenAlexW2090829028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.