Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20333248›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2010

Parental genome dosage imbalance deregulates imprinting in Arabidopsis.

Pauline E Jullien, Frédéric Berger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Taking the Wheel -Frontiers in plant science · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Plant physiology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genomic imprinting, disrupted placental expression, and speciation.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Epigenetic and developmental regulation in plant polyploids.Current opinion in plant biology · 2015
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Pauline E JullienTemasek Life Sciences Laboratory, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Frédéric Berger
National University of Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In mammals and in plants, parental genome dosage imbalance deregulates embryo growth and might be involved in reproductive isolation between emerging new species. Increased dosage of maternal genomes represses growth while an increased dosage of paternal genomes has the opposite effect. These observations led to the discovery of imprinted genes, which are expressed by a single parental allele. It was further proposed in the frame of the parental conflict theory that parental genome imbalances are directly mirrored by antagonistic regulations of imprinted genes encoding maternal growth inhibitors and paternal growth enhancers. However these hypotheses were never tested directly. Here, we investigated the effect of parental genome imbalance on the expression of Arabidopsis imprinted genes FERTILIZATION INDEPENDENT SEED2 (FIS2) and FLOWERING WAGENINGEN (FWA) controlled by DNA methylation, and MEDEA (MEA) and PHERES1 (PHE1) controlled by histone methylation. Genome dosage imbalance deregulated the expression of FIS2 and PHE1 in an antagonistic manner. In addition increased dosage of inactive alleles caused a loss of imprinting of FIS2 and MEA. Although FIS2 controls histone methylation, which represses MEA and PHE1 expression, the changes of PHE1 and MEA expression could not be fully accounted for by the corresponding fluctuations of FIS2 expression. Our results show that parental genome dosage imbalance deregulates imprinting using mechanisms, which are independent from known regulators of imprinting. The complexity of the network of regulations between expressed and silenced alleles of imprinted genes activated in response to parental dosage imbalance does not support simple models derived from the parental conflict hypothesis.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsCrosses, GeneticDNA MethylationGene DosageGene Expression Regulation, PlantGene SilencingGenes, PlantGenome, PlantGenomic ImprintingMADS Domain ProteinsPloidiesPolycomb-Group ProteinsRepressor ProteinsRNA, MessengerTranscription FactorsArabidopsis ProteinsFIS2 protein, ArabidopsisMADS Domain ProteinsMEA protein, ArabidopsisPHERES1 protein, ArabidopsisPolycomb-Group ProteinsRepressor ProteinsRNA, MessengerTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID20333248
PMCPMC2841625
OpenAlexW2057896697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.