ArticleGenome biology and evolution2010
Conservation of human microsatellites across 450 million years of evolution.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Application of Microsatellite Markers as Molecular Tools for Studying Genomic Variability in Vertebrate Populations.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- ZSCAN4-binding motif-TGCACAC is conserved and enriched in CA/TG microsatellites in both mouse and human genomes.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2024Article
- Full-sib progenies show greater genetic diversity than half-sib progenies in sour passion fruit: an approach by ssr markers.Molecular biology reports · 2023Article
- Mononucleotide A-repeats may Play a Regulatory Role in Endothermic Housekeeping Genes.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2022Article
- Review
- On the wrong DNA track: Molecular mechanisms of repeat-mediated genome instability.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2020Review
- Of Men and Mice: Modeling the Fragile X Syndrome.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2018Article
- Functional Mechanisms of Microsatellite DNA in Eukaryotic Genomes.Genome biology and evolution · 2017Review
- Microsatellite polymorphisms associated with human behavioural and psychological phenotypes including a gene-environment interaction.BMC medical genetics · 2017Article
- Strategies for determining kinship in wild populations using genetic data.Ecology and evolution · 2016Review
- Refinement of the karyological aspects of Psidium guineense (Swartz, 1788): a comparison with Psidium guajava (Linnaeus, 1753).Comparative cytogenetics · 2016Article
- SSR markers: a tool for species identification in Psidium (Myrtaceae).Molecular biology reports · 2015Article
- Challenges in analysis and interpretation of microsatellite data for population genetic studies.Ecology and evolution · 2014Review
- Article
- Conserved microsatellites in ants enable population genetic and colony pedigree studies across a wide range of species.PloS one · 2014Article
- RNA-binding protein misregulation in microsatellite expansion disorders.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2014Review
- Non-LTR retrotransposons and microsatellites: Partners in genomic variation.Mobile genetic elements · 2013Review
- Patterns of evolutionary conservation of microsatellites (SSRs) suggest a faster rate of genome evolution in Hymenoptera than in Diptera.Genome biology and evolution · 2013Article
- Microsatellite tandem repeats are abundant in human promoters and are associated with regulatory elements.PloS one · 2013Article
- Measuring microsatellite conservation in mammalian evolution with a phylogenetic birth-death model.Genome biology and evolution · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The sequencing and comparison of vertebrate genomes have enabled the identification of widely conserved genomic elements. Chief among these are genes and cis-regulatory regions, which are often under selective constraints that promote their retention in related organisms. The conservation of elements that either lack function or whose functions are yet to be ascribed has been relatively little investigated. In particular, microsatellites, a class of highly polymorphic repetitive sequences considered by most to be neutrally evolving junk DNA that is too labile to be maintained in distant species, have not been comprehensively studied in a comparative genomic framework. Here, we used the UCSC alignment of the human genome against those of 11 mammalian and five nonmammalian vertebrates to identify and examine the extent of conservation of human microsatellites in vertebrate genomes. Out of 696,016 microsatellites found in human sequences, 85.39% were conserved in at least one other species, whereas 28.65% and 5.98% were found in at least one and three nonprimate species, respectively. An exponential decline of microsatellite conservation with increasing evolutionary time, a comparable distribution of conserved versus nonconserved microsatellites in the human genome, and a positive correlation between microsatellite conservation and overall sequence conservation, all suggest that most microsatellites are only maintained in genomes by chance, although exceptionally conserved human microsatellites were also found in distant mammals and other vertebrates. Our findings provide the first comprehensive survey of microsatellite conservation across deep evolutionary timescales, in this case 450 Myr of vertebrate evolution, and provide new tools for the identification of functional conserved microsatellites, the development of cross-species microsatellite markers and the study of microsatellite evolution above the species level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.