ArticleGenome biology and evolution2009
Scanning for the signatures of positive selection for human-specific insertions and deletions.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Whole-Genome Resequencing Analysis of Athletic Traits in Grassland-Thoroughbred.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Article
- Effect of Collapsed Duplications on Diversity Estimates: What to Expect.Genome biology and evolution · 2018Article
- Genome-wide characterization of genetic variants and putative regions under selection in meat and egg-type chicken lines.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- Complex Evolutionary History of the Mammalian Histone H1.1-H1.5 Gene Family.Molecular biology and evolution · 2017Article
- Fifteen years of genomewide scans for selection: trends, lessons and unaddressed genetic sources of complication.Molecular ecology · 2016Review
- Detection and characterization of small insertion and deletion genetic variants in modern layer chicken genomes.BMC genomics · 2015Article
- Quantitative prediction of the effect of genetic variation using hidden Markov models.BMC bioinformatics · 2014Article
- Strong heterogeneity in mutation rate causes misleading hallmarks of natural selection on indel mutations in the human genome.Molecular biology and evolution · 2014Article
- Evolution of protein indels in plants, animals and fungi.BMC evolutionary biology · 2013Article
- Strong mutational bias toward deletions in the Drosophila melanogaster genome is compensated by selection.Genome biology and evolution · 2013Article
- Exploring the selective constraint on the sizes of insertions and deletions in 5' untranslated regions in mammals.BMC evolutionary biology · 2011Article
- DNA shape, genetic codes, and evolution.Current opinion in structural biology · 2011Review
- High sensitivity to aligner and high rate of false positives in the estimates of positive selection in the 12 Drosophila genomes.Genome research · 2011Article
- Genome-wide influence of indel Substitutions on evolution of bacteria of the PVC superphylum, revealed using a novel computational method.Genome biology and evolution · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human-specific small insertions and deletions (HS indels, with lengths <100 bp) are reported to be ubiquitous in the human genome. However, whether these indels contribute to human-specific traits remains unclear. Here we employ a modified McDonald-Kreitman (MK) test and a combinatorial population genetics approach to infer, respectively, the occurrence of positive selection and recent selective sweep events associated with HS indels. We first extract 625,890 HS indels from the human-chimpanzee-macaque-mouse multiple alignments and classify them into nonpolymorphic (41%) and polymorphic (59%) indels with reference to the human indel polymorphism data. The modified MK test is then applied to 100-kb partially overlapped sliding windows across the human genome to scan for the signs of positive selection. After excluding the possibility of biased gene conversion and controlling for false discovery rate, we show that HS indels are potentially positively selected in about 10 Mb of the human genome. Furthermore, the indel-associated positively selected regions overlap with genes more often than expected. However, our result suggests that the potential targets of positive selection are located in noncoding regions. Meanwhile, we also demonstrate that the genomic regions surrounding HS indels are more frequently involved in recent selective sweep than the other regions. In addition, HS indels are associated with distinct recent selective sweep events in different human subpopulations. Our results suggest that HS indels may have been associated with human adaptive changes at both the species level and the subpopulation level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.