Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20333177›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2009

Footprints of inversions at present and past pseudoautosomal boundaries in human sex chromosomes.

Claire Lemaitre, Marilia D V Braga, Christian Gautier, Marie-France Sagot, Eric Tannier, Gabriel A B Marais

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Global modulation of gene expression and transcriptome size in aneuploid combinations of maize.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Sex Chromosome Evolution: Hallmarks and Question Marks.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024
    Review
  9. New algorithms for structure informed genome rearrangement.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Claire LemaitreUniversité de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique, UMR5558, Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie évolutive, Villeurbanne, F-69622 cedex, France.
Marilia D V Braga
Christian Gautier
Marie-France Sagot
Eric Tannier
Gabriel A B Marais

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human sex chromosomes have stopped recombining gradually, which has left five evolutionary strata on the X chromosome. Y inversions are thought to have suppressed X-Y recombination but clear evidence is missing. Here, we looked for such evidence by focusing on a region--the X-added region (XAR)--that includes the pseudoautosomal region and the most recent strata 3 to 5. We estimated and analyzed the whole set of parsimonious scenarios of Y inversions given the gene order in XAR and its Y homolog. Comparing these to scenarios for simulated sequences suggests that the strata 4 and 5 were formed by Y inversions. By comparing the X and Y DNA sequences, we found clear evidence of two Y inversions associated with duplications that coincide with the boundaries of strata 4 and 5. Divergence between duplicates is in agreement with the timing of strata 4 and 5 formation. These duplicates show a complex pattern of gene conversion that resembles the pattern previously found for AMELXY, a stratum 3 locus. This suggests that this locus--despite AMELY being unbroken--was possibly involved in a Y inversion that formed stratum 3. However, no clear evidence supporting the formation of stratum 3 by a Y inversion was found, probably because this stratum is too old for such an inversion to be detectable. Our results strongly support the view that the most recent human strata have arisen by Y inversions and suggest that inversions have played a major role in the differentiation of our sex chromosomes.

Indexed as

duplicationevolutionary stratainversionrecombinationsex chromosomes

Identifiers

PMID20333177
PMCPMC2817401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.