Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20332526›Full record

ReviewGut2010

Classification and management of refractory coeliac disease.

Alberto Rubio-Tapia, Joseph A Murray

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gut, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03866538 (Open-label Withdrawal Trial of Budesonide in Patients With Immune Mediated Enteropathies), which is not on this map. Cited by 111 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03866538 phase4terminatednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Open-label Withdrawal Trial of Budesonide in Patients With Immune Mediated Enteropathies

TypeinterventionalSponsorMayo ClinicRan2019 to 2021Enrolled1ConditionsEnteropathy, Celiac Disease, CVID Enteropathy, Collagenous SprueArmsWithdrawal of Oral Budesonide
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 323 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. ACG clinical guidelines: diagnosis and management of celiac disease.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2013
    Guideline
  5. Combined ProbioticMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alberto Rubio-TapiaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Joseph A Murray
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

EPIDEMIOLOGY OF CELIAC DISEASE--A POPULATION BASED STUDYR01DK057892 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI MURRAY, JOSEPH A · 2000 to 2010
$3.9M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN ALLERGIC DISEASEST32AI007047 · NIAID · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KITA, HIROHITO · 1985 to 2016
$2.0M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007047NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI-07047NIDDK NIH HHS DK-57892NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK057892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Refractory coeliac disease (RCD) is defined by persistent or recurrent malabsorptive symptoms and villous atrophy despite strict adherence to a gluten-free diet (GFD) for at least 6-12 months in the absence of other causes of non-responsive treated coeliac disease and overt malignancy. Symptoms are often severe and require additional therapeutic intervention besides a GFD. RCD can be classified as type 1 (normal intraepithelial lymphocyte phenotype), or type 2 (defined by the presence of abnormal (clonal) intraepithelial lymphocyte phenotype). Patients with RCD may never have responded to a GFD or may have relapsed despite adherence and initial response to the GFD. RCD type 1 usually improves after treatment with a combination of aggressive nutritional support, adherence to a GFD, and alternative pharmacological therapies. By contrast, clinical response to alternative therapies in RCD type 2 is less certain and the prognosis is poor. Severe complications such as ulcerative jejunitis and enteropathy-associated T cell lymphoma may occur in a subgroup of patients with RCD. The aims of this article are to (1) review recent advances in the diagnosis and management of patients with RCD, and (2) describe current and novel methods for classification of patients with RCD into categories that are useful to predict outcome and direct treatment.

Indexed as

Celiac DiseaseDiagnosis, DifferentialDiet, Gluten-FreeHumansImmunophenotypingIntestinal MucosaPrognosisT-Lymphocyte SubsetsTreatment Failure

Identifiers

PMID20332526
PMCPMC2861306
OpenAlexW2156197620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.