Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20332298›Full record

ArticleCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2010

The detection of chromosomal aneusomy by fluorescence in situ hybridization in sputum predicts lung cancer incidence.

Marileila Varella-Garcia, Aline P Schulte, Holly J Wolf, William J Feser, Chan Zeng, Sarah Braudrick, Xiang Yin, Fred R Hirsch, Timothy C Kennedy, Robert L Keith and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Clinical Utility of Chromosomal Aneusomy in Individuals at High Risk of Lung Cancer.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2017
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Convergence of nanotechnology and cancer prevention: are we there yet?Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2014
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Analysis of MicroRNAs in sputum to improve computed tomography for lung cancer diagnosis.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2014
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Surveillance of resected non-small cell lung cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2012
    Review
  13. Defining a gene promoter methylation signature in sputum for lung cancer risk assessment.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2012
    Article
  14. Update on biomarkers for the detection of lung cancer.Lung Cancer (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2012
    Review
  15. Progressive endobronchial premalignancy: marked by original CIN.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2011
    Article
  16. Article
  17. [Advances in early diagnosis of lung cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2011
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Marileila Varella-GarciaUniversity of Colorado Denver, 12801 East 17th Avenue, Aurora, CO 80045, USA. Marileila.Garcia@ucdenver.edu
Aline P Schulte
Holly J Wolf
William J Feser
Chan Zeng
Sarah Braudrick
Xiang Yin
Fred R Hirsch
Timothy C Kennedy
Robert L Keith
Anna E Barón
Steven A Belinsky
York E Miller
Tim Byers
Wilbur A Franklin
Kaiser Permanente · USUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs · USLockheed Martin (United States) · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USLovelace Respiratory Research Institute · US

Funding

University of Colorado Cancer Center Support Grant - Lung Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts with Autologous Human Immune SystemsP30CA046934 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI James V Degregori · 1988 to 2026
$117.0M
Tissue Bank and Biomarkers CoreP50CA058187 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI MILLER, YORK E · 1992 to 2018
$43.8M
TARGETING EARLY CHANGES FOR NEW SCREENING STRATEGIESP50CA058184 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BISWAL, SHYAM · 1992 to 2013
$30.5M
Colorado Biomarkers Development LaboratoryU01CA085070 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI FRANKLIN, WILBUR A · 1999 to 2009
$4.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046934NCI NIH HHS P30-CA46934NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058184NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058187NCI NIH HHS P50CA58184NCI NIH HHS P50CA58187NCI NIH HHS U01 CA085070NCI NIH HHS U01-CA85070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer usually is disseminated (advanced) and has a poor prognosis at diagnosis. Current and former smokers are at a high risk for lung cancer and are candidates for prevention and early detection strategies. Sputum is a potential source of biomarkers that might determine either lung cancer risk or the presence of early lung cancer, but no current sputum test is sufficiently sensitive and specific for effective screening. We used fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to measure chromosomal aneusomy (CA) in sputum samples collected prospectively from 100 incident lung cancer cases and 96 controls (matched on age, gender, and date of collection) nested within an ongoing high-risk cohort. The CA-FISH assay was aimed at four DNA targets: epidermal growth factor receptor, MYC, 5p15, and CEP 6. The sensitivity of a positive CA-FISH assay (abnormal for two or more of the four markers) for lung cancer was substantially higher for samples collected within 18 months (76% sensitivity) than for samples collected more than 18 months (31%) before lung cancer diagnosis. Sensitivity was higher for squamous cell cancers (94%) than for other histologic types (69%). CA-FISH specificity based on samples collected within 18 months before diagnosis was 88%. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) of lung cancer for specimens collected within 18 months before a cancer diagnosis was higher for the CA-FISH assay [OR, 29.9; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 9.5-94.1] than for previously studied ORs of cytologic atypia (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.3-2.6) and gene promoter methylation (OR, 6.5; 95% CI, 1.2-35.5). Whether CA-FISH is an indicator of extreme risk for incident lung cancer or detects exfoliated cancer cells is unknown. The apparent promise of CA-FISH in sputum for assessing lung cancer risk and/or for lung cancer early detection now needs to be validated in a clinical screening trial.

Indexed as

AgedArea Under CurveBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansIncidenceIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificitySputumBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID20332298
PMCPMC2939746
OpenAlexW2102511272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.