Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20331806›Full record

ReviewOral diseases2010

Folic acid and orofacial clefts: a review of the evidence.

G L Wehby, J C Murray

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oral diseases, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. High dosage folic acid supplementation, oral cleft recurrence and fetal growth.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2013
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Protective effect ofNagoya journal of medical science · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

G L WehbyDepartment of Health Management and Policy, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
J C Murray

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF IOWA CTSA FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024979 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI ROSENTHAL, GARY E · 2007 to 2011
$31.8M
PHENOTYPE AND GENETICS IN OROFACIAL CLEFT FAMILIESP50DE016215 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI LOVETT, MICHAEL · 2004 to 2008
$10.1M
Molecular Genetic Epidemiology of Cleft Lip and PalateR37DE008559 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI MURRAY, JEFFREY C · 2004 to 2013
$6.8M
Oral cleft prevention programU01DE017958 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI MURRAY, JEFFREY C · 2006 to 2010
$4.7M
MOLECULAR GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY OF CLEFT LIP AND PALATER01DE008559 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI MURRAY, JEFFREY C · 1988 to 2003
$1.5M
Health outcomes and improved phenotypic characterization of cleft lip and palateR01DD000295 · DD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI WEHBY, GEORGE L · 2007 to 2009
$1.4M
Effects of oral clefts on birth outcomes and cleft risks due to maternal smokingR03DE018394 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI WEHBY, GEORGE L · 2007 to 2008
$295k
NCBDD CDC HHS 1R01DD000295NCBDD CDC HHS R01 DD000295NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024979NIDCR NIH HHS 1R03 DE018394NIDCR NIH HHS P50 DE016215NIDCR NIH HHS P50 DE-16215NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE008559NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE-08559NIDCR NIH HHS R03 DE018394NIDCR NIH HHS R37 DE008559NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE-017958NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE017958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orofacial clefts are common and burdensome birth defects with a complex genetic and environmental etiology. The contribution of nutritional factors and supplements to the etiology of orofacial clefts has long been theorized and studied. Multiple studies have evaluated the role of folic acid in the occurrence and recurrence of orofacial clefts, using observational and non-randomized interventional designs. While preventive effects of folic acid on orofacial clefts are commonly reported, the evidence remains generally inconsistent. This paper reviews the findings of the main studies of the effects of folic acid on orofacial clefts, summarizes study limitations, and discusses research needs with a focus on studying the effects of high dosage folic acid on the recurrence of oral clefts using a randomized clinical trial design. The role of folic acid in the prevention of neural tube defects is also briefly summarized and discussed as a reference model for orofacial clefts.

Indexed as

Cleft LipCleft PalateClinical Trials as TopicFolic AcidGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHumansNeural Tube DefectsVitamin B ComplexFolic AcidVitamin B Complex

Identifiers

PMID20331806
PMCPMC2922396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.