Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20331471›Full record

ArticleImmunology2010

Ribosomal versus non-ribosomal cellular antigens: factors determining efficiency of indirect presentation to CD4+ T cells.

Mary Philip, Andrea Schietinger, Hans Schreiber

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Immunology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mary PhilipCommittee on Cancer Biology, and Department of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. adastra@uw.edu
Andrea Schietinger
Hans Schreiber
University of Chicago · US

Funding

Protein Expression and Peptide CoreP01CA097296 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SCHREIBER, HANS · 2003 to 2012
$15.0M
Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (NRSA) Institutional Research Training Grant (Parent T32)T32HD007009 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI NANCY B SCHWARTZ · 1985 to 2026
$13.0M
PATHOBIOLOGY OF MYELOMA AND ANTI-IDIOTYPIC IMMUNITYR01CA022677 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SCHREIBER, HANS · 1985 to 2024
$6.3M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA097296NCI NIH HHS P01-CA97296NCI NIH HHS R01 CA022677NCI NIH HHS R01-CA22677NCI NIH HHS R01-CA37516NICHD NIH HHS HD 07009NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins released from dying cells can be taken up and presented by antigen-presenting cells (APC) to T cells. While the presentation of such self antigens may lead to beneficial anti-tumour responses, in autoimmune disease it leads to pathological immune responses. The sub-set of self proteins targeted in autoimmune disease is circumscribed, and certain cellular components such as ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes are often targeted. Although explanations for this antigen selectivity have been proposed, there has been little direct testing of these hypotheses. We and others previously showed that ribosomal proteins, targeted in autoimmune disease, are also targets of anti-tumour T-cell responses. We asked whether particular properties of ribosomal proteins such as incorporation into RNP complexes or sub-cellular localization enhance ribosomal protein presentation by APC to CD4(+) T cells. Ribosomal protein antigens within purified intact ribosomes or free of the ribosomes were equally well taken up and presented by APC, demonstrating that inclusion of ribosomal proteins into an RNP complex does not confer an advantage. However, antigens localized to ribosomes within apoptotic cells were less efficiently taken up and presented by APC than the same antigens localized diffusely throughout the cell. This suggests that presentation of ribosomal proteins is somehow down-regulated, possibly to facilitate presentation of other less-abundant intracellular proteins. Consequently, the explanation for the frequent targeting of ribosomal proteins by both autoimmune and anti-tumour T-cell responses is not at the level of uptake from apoptotic cells and must be sought elsewhere.

Indexed as

Antigen PresentationAnimalsAntigen-Presenting CellsAntigensApoptosisCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCell LineMiceRibonucleoproteinsRibosomesAntigensRibonucleoproteins

Identifiers

PMID20331471
PMCPMC2913260
OpenAlexW1808049880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.