ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2010
Electron-nuclear interactions as probes of domain motion in proteins.
Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Expanding the utility of NMR restraints with paramagnetic compounds: background and practical aspects.Progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Long range interactions between nuclear spins and paramagnetic ions can serve as a sensitive monitor of internal motion of various parts of proteins, including functional loops and separate domains. In the case of interdomain motion, the interactions between the ion and NMR-observable nuclei are modulated in direction and magnitude mainly by a combination of overall and interdomain motions. The effects on observable parameters such as paramagnetic relaxation enhancement (PRE) and pseudocontact shift (PCS) can, in principle, be used to characterize motion. These parameters are frequently used for the purpose of structural refinements. However, their use to probe actual domain motions is less common and is lacking a proper theoretical treatment from a motional perspective. In this work, a suitable spin Hamiltonian is incorporated in a two body diffusion model to produce the time correlation function for the nuclear spin-paramagnetic ion interactions. Simulated observables for nuclei in different positions with respect to the paramagnetic ion are produced. Based on these simulations, it demonstrated that both the PRE and the PCS can be very sensitive probes of domain motion. Results for different nuclei within the protein sense different aspects of the motions. Some are more sensitive to the amplitude of the internal motion, others are more sensitive to overall diffusion rates, allowing separation of these contributions. Experimentally, the interaction strength can also be tuned by substitution of different paramagnetic ions or by varying magnetic field strength (in the case of lanthanides) to allow the use of more detailed diffusion models without reducing the reliability of data fitting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.