Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2031974›Full record

ReviewAnnals of hematology1991

Cytosine arabinoside in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia: the role and place of high-dose regimens.

W Hiddemann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of hematology, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Knockdown of CD44 enhances chemosensitivity of acute myeloid leukemia cells to ADM and Ara-C.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. DNA polymerase eta and chemotherapeutic agents.Antioxidants & redox signaling · 2011
    Review
  15. DNA lesion bypass polymerases and 4'-thio-β-Darabinofuranosylcytosine (T-araC).International journal of biochemistry and molecular biology · 2011
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

W HiddemannDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Münster, Federal Republic of Germany.
University of Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cytosine arabinoside (AraC) is one of the most active drugs in the treatment of acute leukemias and is widely applied at all phases of therapy. In spite of extensive clinical and experimental investigations, its intracellular metabolism and especially its mechanism of action are still not fully elucidated. Controversy also continues about the most appropriate way and dose of administration; which differs by more than 100 fold in clinical studies ranging from low-dose, over standard and intermediate dose regimens, to high-dose protocols. The present review is focused on the role and place of high-dose AraC treatment in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Based on available clinical and experimental data, the following conclusions can be drawn: Not considering possible but not yet demonstrated beneficial long-term effects, the incorporation of high-dose AraC into induction therapy has not resulted in an improvement of overall remission rate, with the possible exception of patients with slow initial cytoreduction after a first course of conventional treatment. Promising results, however, emerge from high-dose AraC-based consolidation protocols, which need confirmation in prospectively randomized comparative trials. In relapsed and refractory AML, higher than conventional doses undoubtedly enhance the efficacy of AraC salvage therapy. The question of whether the antileukemic activity of intermediate-dose regimens with 500-1,000 mg/m2 AraC is equivalent to that of high-dose protocols applying 2,000-3,000 mg/m2 AraC, however, remains open but may soon be answered by ongoing controlled clinical and pharmacologic investigations.

Indexed as

CytarabineDrug ResistanceHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteRecurrenceCytarabine

Identifiers

PMID2031974
OpenAlexW2029007438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.