Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20309754›Full record

ArticleJournal of biopharmaceutical statistics2010

Discrete nonparametric algorithms for outlier detection with genomic data.

Debashis Ghosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. aTEMPO: Pathway-Specific Temporal Anomalies for Precision Therapeutics.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. CSAX: Characterizing Systematic Anomalies in eXpression Data.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2015
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Unsupervised outlier profile analysis.Cancer informatics · 2014
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Outlier Analysis and Top Scoring Pair for Integrated Data Analysis and Biomarker Discovery.IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Debashis GhoshDepartment of Statistics, Penn State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA. ghoshd@psu.edu

Funding

Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Microarray DataR01GM072007 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GHOSH, DEBASHIS · 2004 to 2008
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM072007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In high-throughput studies involving genetic data such as from gene expression microarrays, differential expression analysis between two or more experimental conditions has been a very common analytical task. Much of the resulting literature on multiple comparisons has paid relatively little attention to the choice of test statistic. In this article, we focus on the issue of choice of test statistic based on a special pattern of differential expression. The approach here is based on recasting multiple-comparison procedures for assessing outlying expression values. A major complication is that the resulting p values are discrete; some theoretical properties of sequential testing procedures in this context are explored. We propose the use of q value estimation procedures in this setting. Data from a gene expression profiling experiment in prostate cancer are used to illustrate the methodology.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsModels, StatisticalStatistics, NonparametricComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenomicsHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansMaleOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisProstatic NeoplasmsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID20309754
PMCPMC2845329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.