Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20309531›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2010

Nicotine modulation of information processing is not limited to input (attention) but extends to output (intention).

Emma J Rose, Thomas J Ross, Pradeep K Kurup, Elliot A Stein

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Can the Brain Be Relativistic?Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Nicotine levels after IV nicotine and cigarette smoking in men.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Emma J RoseNeuroimaging Research Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse-Intramural Research Program, 251 Bayview Blvd. Suite 200 (NIDA), Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
Thomas J Ross
Pradeep K Kurup
Elliot A Stein
National Institute on Drug Abuse · US

Funding

Functional and Structural Brain Circuits Underlying SmokingZIADA000573 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI STEIN, ELLIOT A · 2010 to 2021
$19.4M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 DA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleNicotine influences many cognitive processes, especially those requiring high attentional loads, yet the impact of nicotine on all aspects of information processing has not been well delineated.

objectiveThe aim of the study was to determine the relative behavioral and functional effects of nicotine on dissociable aspects of information processing (i.e., selective attention and motor intention).

methodsAdult smokers (N = 25) and healthy controls (N = 23) performed the intention/attention task (IAT) twice, during functional magnetic resonance imaging. The IAT assesses the relative differences in performance evoked by prime stimuli that provide information regarding either the correct hand with which to respond (i.e., intentional primes) or the likely location of a target stimulus (i.e., attentional primes). Smokers were scanned 2 h after nicotine (21 mg) or placebo patch placement. The order of nicotine and placebo sessions was randomized and counter-balanced. Controls were also scanned twice, with no patch placement in either session.

resultsWhile drug condition had no significant effect on reaction time, smokers were overall more accurate than controls. Moreover, nicotine significantly increased the response to intentional primes in brain regions known to mediate response readiness, e.g., inferior parietal lobe, supramarginal gyrus, and striatum.

conclusionsWhile limited to participant accuracy, these data suggest that the behavioral effects of nicotine in smokers are not only limited to information processing input (i.e., selective attention) but are also generalizable to output functions (i.e., motor intention). Moreover, nicotine's effects on intention appear to be mediated by a facilitation of function in brain regions associated with information processing output.

Indexed as

IntentionAdministration, CutaneousAdultAttentionBrainCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMental ProcessesModels, StatisticalMonte Carlo MethodNicotineNicotinic AgonistsPsychomotor PerformanceNicotineNicotinic Agonists

Identifiers

PMID20309531
PMCPMC3890397
OpenAlexW1991059110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.