Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20309525›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2010

The Ontario Osteoporosis Strategy: implementation of a population-based osteoporosis action plan in Canada.

S B Jaglal, G Hawker, C Cameron, J Canavan, D Beaton, E Bogoch, R Jain, A Papaioannou, Osteoporosis Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Working Group

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A review of patient-centred post-fracture interventions in the context of theories of health behaviour change.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2011
    Pooled it
  2. Coordinator-based systems for secondary prevention in fragility fracture patients.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2011
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Quality of fracture risk assessment in post-fracture care in Ontario, Canada.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2013
    Trial
  5. Impact of a centralized osteoporosis coordinator on post-fracture osteoporosis management: a cluster randomized trial.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2012
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Cultivating across "pockets of excellence": challenges to sustaining efforts to improve osteoporosis care.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Article
  11. Personal digital health hubs for multiple conditions.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2020
    Article
  12. Having caregiving responsibilities affects management of fragility fractures and bone health.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Article
  13. Observational
  14. Five-year refracture rates of a province-wide fracture liaison service.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2019
    Article
  15. Equal treatment: no evidence of gender inequity in osteoporosis management in a coordinator-based fragility fracture screening program.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Osteoporosis knowledge translation for young adults: new directions for prevention programs.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2017
    Article
  18. The impact of fragility fractures on work and characteristics associated with time to return to work.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2017
    Article
  19. Men's health-seeking behaviours regarding bone health after a fragility fracture: a secondary analysis of qualitative data.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2016
    Article
  20. Comparative trends in incident fracture rates for all long-term care and community-dwelling seniors in Ontario, Canada, 2002-2012.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

S B JaglalDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, 160-500 University Ave, Toronto, ON, M5G 1V7, Canada, susan.jaglal@utoronto.ca.
G Hawker
C Cameron
J Canavan
D Beaton
E Bogoch
R Jain
A Papaioannou
Osteoporosis Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Working Group
University of Toronto · CAMcMaster University · CAMinistry of Health and Long Term Care · CAOsteoporosis Canada · CASt Michaels Hospital · GBSt. Michael's Hospital · CA

Funding

CIHR 88225-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last decade, there have been a number of action plans published to highlight the importance of preventing osteoporosis and related fractures. In the province of Ontario Canada, the Ministry of Health provided funding for the Ontario Osteoporosis Strategy. The goal is to reduce morbidity, mortality, and costs from osteoporosis and related fractures through an integrated and comprehensive approach aimed at health promotion and disease management. This paper describes the components of the Ontario Osteoporosis Strategy and progress on implementation efforts as of March 2009. There are five main components: health promotion; bone mineral density testing, access, and quality; postfracture care; professional education; and research and evaluation. Responsibility for implementation of the initiatives within the components is shared across a number of professional and patient organizations and academic teaching hospitals with osteoporosis researchers. The lessons learned from each phase of the development, implementation, and evaluation of the Ontario Osteoporosis Strategy provides a tremendous opportunity to inform other jurisdictions embarking on implementing similar large-scale bone health initiatives.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBone DensityCommunity Health PlanningEducation, Medical, ContinuingFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedOntarioOsteoporosisOsteoporotic Fractures

Identifiers

PMID20309525
PMCPMC5101075
OpenAlexW2006106990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.