Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20308101›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2010

Beneficial mutations and the dynamics of adaptation in asexual populations.

Paul D Sniegowski, Philip J Gerrish

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Inferring Epistasis from Genetic Time-series Data.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paul D SniegowskiDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, , Philadelphia, PA 19063, USA. paulsnie@sas.upenn.edu
Philip J Gerrish

Funding

Fine-scale recombination, variation, divergence, and codon bias in DrosophilaR01GM086445 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KLIMAN, RICHARD M, NOOR, MOHAMED A · 2009 to 2012
$1.4M
Genetics of speciation in Drosophila pseudoobscuraR01GM076051 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NOOR, MOHAMED A · 2007 to 2011
$1.2M
Mutation rate catastrophe: testing a novel theory for the extinction of clonal orR01GM079483 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI GERRISH, PHILIP JOHN · 2008 to 2010
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM076051NIGMS NIH HHS GM086445NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We discuss the dynamics of adaptive evolution in asexual (clonal) populations. The classical 'periodic selection' model of clonal evolution assumed that beneficial mutations are very rare and therefore substitute unfettered into populations as occasional, isolated events. Newer models allow for the possibility that beneficial mutations are sufficiently common to coexist and compete for fixation within populations. Experimental evolution studies in microbes provide empirical support for stochastic models in which both selection and mutation are strong effects and clones compete for fixation; however, the relative importance of competition among clones bearing mutations of different selective effects versus competition among clones bearing multiple mutations remains unresolved. We provide some new theoretical results, moreover, suggesting that population dynamics consistent with the periodic selection model can arise even in a deterministic model that can accommodate a very high beneficial mutation rate.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticMutationSelection, GeneticBacteriaClone CellsGenetics, PopulationReproduction, AsexualStochastic Processes

Identifiers

PMID20308101
PMCPMC2871819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.