Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20307807›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2010

Cancer screening in Native Americans from the Northern Plains.

Nancy Pandhi, B Ashleigh Guadagnolo, Shalini Kanekar, Daniel G Petereit, Maureen A Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Using the Community Readiness Model to Assess American Indian Communities Readiness to Address Cancer Prevention and Control Programs.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nancy PandhiDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, USA. nancy.pandhi@fammed.wisc.edu
B Ashleigh Guadagnolo
Shalini Kanekar
Daniel G Petereit
Maureen A Smith
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

INSTITUTIONAL CTSA (UW-MADISON): CLINICAL TRIALSUL1RR025011 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2007 to 2011
$29.5M
Enhancing Native American Participation in RT TrialsU56CA099010 · NCI · RAPID CITY REGIONAL HOSPITAL · PI PETEREIT, DANIEL G · 2002 to 2008
$6.2M
Walking Forward - American Indian Participation in Cancer Clinical TrialsU54CA142157 · NCI · RAPID CITY REGIONAL HOSPITAL · PI PETEREIT, DANIEL G · 2009 to 2013
$4.1M
NCI NIH HHS 1U56CA99010-01NCI NIH HHS N01 CO012400NCI NIH HHS N01-CO-12400NCI NIH HHS U54 CA142157NCI NIH HHS U56 CA099010NCRR NIH HHS 1 UL1 RR025011NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNative Americans from the Northern Plains have the highest age-adjusted cancer mortality compared to Native Americans from any other region in the U.S. PURPOSE: This study examined the utilization and determinants of cancer screening in a large sample of Native Americans from the Northern Plains.

methodsA survey was administered orally to 975 individuals in 2004-2006 from three reservations and among the urban Native-American community in the service region of the Rapid City Regional Hospital. Data analysis was conducted in 2007-2008.

resultsForty-four percent of individuals reported ever receiving any cancer screening. Particularly low levels were found for breast, cervical, prostate, and colon cancer screening. In multivariate analyses, the strongest determinant of receiving cancer screening overall or cancer screening for a specific cancer site was recommendation for screening by a doctor or nurse. Other determinants associated with increased likelihood of ever having cancer screening included older age, female gender, and receiving physical exams more than once a year. Increased age was a determinant of breast cancer screening, and receiving physical exams was associated with cervical cancer screening.

conclusionsCancer screening was markedly underutilized in this sample of Native Americans from the Northern Plains. Future research should evaluate the potential for improving cancer screening.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsColonic NeoplasmsConfidence IntervalsFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansIndians, North AmericanMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasmsOdds Ratio

Identifiers

PMID20307807
PMCPMC2851544
OpenAlexW2108822640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.