Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20307669›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cancer biology2010

A mobile threat to genome stability: The impact of non-LTR retrotransposons upon the human genome.

Miriam K Konkel, Mark A Batzer

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cancer biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed
26.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 192 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. SomaticiScience · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Miriam K KonkelDepartment of Biological Sciences, Biological Computation and Visualization Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.
Mark A Batzer
Louisiana State University · US

Funding

VASCULAR STATUS, PHYSICAL FUNCTION, AND HEALTHY AGINGP01AG022064 · NIA · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI JAZWINSKI, S MICHAL · 2004 to 2010
$9.6M
POPULATION GENETICS OF MOBILE ELEMENTSR01GM059290 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI BATZER, MARK A, FESCHOTTE, CEDRIC · 1999 to 2018
$8.5M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG0022064NIA NIH HHS P01 AG022064NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059290NIGMS NIH HHS R0I GM59290
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is now commonly agreed that the human genome is not the stable entity originally presumed. Deletions, duplications, inversions, and insertions are common, and contribute significantly to genomic structural variations (SVs). Their collective impact generates much of the inter-individual genomic diversity observed among humans. Not only do these variations change the structure of the genome; they may also have functional implications, e.g. altered gene expression. Some SVs have been identified as the cause of genetic disorders, including cancer predisposition. Cancer cells are notorious for their genomic instability, and often show genomic rearrangements at the microscopic and submicroscopic level to which transposable elements (TEs) contribute. Here, we review the role of TEs in genome instability, with particular focus on non-LTR retrotransposons. Currently, three non-LTR retrotransposon families - long interspersed element 1 (L1), SVA (short interspersed element (SINE-R), variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR), and Alu), and Alu (a SINE) elements - mobilize in the human genome, and cause genomic instability through both insertion- and post-insertion-based mutagenesis. Due to the abundance and high sequence identity of TEs, they frequently mislead the homologous recombination repair pathway into non-allelic homologous recombination, causing deletions, duplications, and inversions. While less comprehensively studied, non-LTR retrotransposon insertions and TE-mediated rearrangements are probably more common in cancer cells than in healthy tissue. This may be at least partially attributed to the commonly seen global hypomethylation as well as general epigenetic dysfunction of cancer cells. Where possible, we provide examples that impact cancer predisposition and/or development.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA MethylationGenomic InstabilityHumansModels, BiologicalMutagenesis, InsertionalRecombination, GeneticRetroelementsTerminal Repeat SequencesRetroelements

Identifiers

PMID20307669
PMCPMC2925057
OpenAlexW2116338406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.