ArticleBMC bioinformatics2010
Identification of recurrent regions of Copy-Number Variants across multiple individuals.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- CRESCENT: a deep learning framework with multi-scale attention for detecting recurrent copy number alterations.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Increased copy-number variant load of associated risk genes in sporadic cases of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024Article
- Association test using Copy Number Profile Curves (CONCUR) enhances power in rare copy number variant analysis.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- A large interactive visual database of copy number variants discovered in taurine cattle.GigaScience · 2019Article
- Accumulation of potential driver genes with genomic alterations predicts survival of high-risk neuroblastoma patients.Biology direct · 2018Article
- Association between copy-number variation on metabolic phenotypes and HDL-C levels in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.Molecular biology reports · 2017Article
- Genome instability model of metastatic neuroblastoma tumorigenesis by a dictionary learning algorithm.BMC medical genomics · 2015Article
- Integrated molecular portrait of non-small cell lung cancers.BMC medical genomics · 2013Article
- Copy number variation signature to predict human ancestry.BMC bioinformatics · 2012Article
- Accuracy of CNV Detection from GWAS Data.PloS one · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlgorithms and software for CNV detection have been developed, but they detect the CNV regions sample-by-sample with individual-specific breakpoints, while common CNV regions are likely to occur at the same genomic locations across different individuals in a homogenous population. Current algorithms to detect common CNV regions do not account for the varying reliability of the individual CNVs, typically reported as confidence scores by SNP-based CNV detection algorithms. General methodologies for identifying these recurrent regions, especially those directed at SNP arrays, are still needed.
resultsIn this paper, we describe two new approaches for identifying common CNV regions based on (i) the frequency of occurrence of reliable CNVs, where reliability is determined by high confidence scores, and (ii) a weighted frequency of occurrence of CNVs, where the weights are determined by the confidence scores. In addition, motivated by the fact that we often observe partially overlapping CNV regions as a mixture of two or more distinct subregions, regions identified using the two approaches can be fine-tuned to smaller sub-regions using a clustering algorithm. We compared the performance of the methods with sequencing-based results in terms of discordance rates, rates of departure from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) and average frequency and size of the identified regions. The discordance rates as well as the rates of departure from HWE decrease when we select CNVs with higher confidence scores. We also performed comparisons with two previously published methods, STAC and GISTIC, and showed that the methods we consider are better at identifying low-frequency but high-confidence CNV regions.
conclusionsThe proposed methods for identifying common CNV regions in multiple individuals perform well compared to existing methods. The identified common regions can be used for downstream analyses such as group comparisons in association studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.