Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20306203›Full record

ReviewDevelopment genes and evolution2010

The Drosophila neural lineages: a model system to study brain development and circuitry.

Shana R Spindler, Volker Hartenstein

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Development genes and evolution, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Low-nutrient diet inOpen biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Drosophila ßNature communications · 2021
    Article
  12. Tumor models in various Drosophila tissues.WIREs mechanisms of disease · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shana R SpindlerDepartment of Molecular Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Volker Hartenstein
National Institutes of Health · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Lineage-associated wiring properties of Drosphila brain neuronsR01NS054814 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HARTENSTEIN, VOLKER, LOUIS, MATTHIEU R. P. J. C. G. · 2006 to 2025
$6.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS054814
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Drosophila, neurons of the central nervous system are grouped into units called lineages. Each lineage contains cells derived from a single neuroblast. Due to its clonal nature, the Drosophila brain is a valuable model system to study neuron development and circuit formation. To better understand the mechanisms underlying brain development, genetic manipulation tools can be utilized within lineages to visualize, knock down, or over-express proteins. Here, we will introduce the formation and development of lineages, discuss how one can utilize this model system, offer a comprehensive list of known lineages and their respective markers, and then briefly review studies that have utilized Drosophila neural lineages with a look at how this model system can benefit future endeavors.

Indexed as

Cell LineageAnimalsBrainCell DifferentiationCentral Nervous SystemDrosophilaModels, BiologicalNeurons

Identifiers

PMID20306203
PMCPMC2886914
OpenAlexW2123627175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.