Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20305141›Full record

SynthesisHaematologica2010

Low molecular weight heparin for the treatment of retinal vein occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Alejandro Lazo-Langner, Jeff Hawel, Walter Ageno, Michael J Kovacs

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Haematologica, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Guidance for the management of venous thrombosis in unusual sites.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Retinal vein occlusion: time for action has come.Internal and emergency medicine · 2011
    Article
  12. Retinal vein occlusions: a review for the internist.Internal and emergency medicine · 2011
    Review
  13. Article
  14. [The value of acetylsalicylic acid in retinal vein occlusion].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2010
    Article
  15. Retinal vein occlusion: pathophysiology and treatment options.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2010
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alejandro Lazo-LangnerHematology Division, London Health Sciences Centre, Victoria Hospital. 800 Commissioners Rd E PO Box 5010 Rm A2-401 London ON, N6A 5W9, Canada. alejandro.lazolangner@lhsc.on.ca
Jeff Hawel
Walter Ageno
Michael J Kovacs
Western University · CALondon Health Sciences Centre · CAUniversity of Insubria · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinal vein occlusion is a frequent cause of visual loss for which few effective therapies are available. Anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin might be of value in its treatment. We conducted a systematic review and meta analysis of randomized trials evaluating the effect of low molecular weight heparin in patients with retinal vein occlusion. Data sources included MEDLINE, EMBASE, HealthSTAR, the Cochrane Library, Lilacs, the Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science database and gray literature. Main outcome was the mean difference between the visual acuity measured at baseline and at six months expressed in the logMAR scale. Secondary outcome was a composite of any adverse ocular outcome including: worsening of visual acuity, visual fields or fluorescein angiography, or development of iris neovascularization, any neovascularization or neovascular glaucoma. Subgroup analyses for branch versus central retinal vein occlusion were conducted. We identified 1,084 references of which 3 studies comparing low molecular weight heparin with aspirin (229 evaluable patients) were included. Overall, the pooled mean visual acuity difference was -0.23 logMAR (95% CI -0.38, -0.09; P=0.002) in favor of low molecular weight heparin. Low molecular weight heparin was associated with a 78% risk reduction for developing any adverse ocular outcome (pooled RR 0.22; 95% CI 0.10, 0.46; P<0.001). In subgroup analyses benefits seemed lower in branch retinal vein occlusion. No increased vitreous hemorrhages were observed. In patients with retinal vein occlusion treatment with low molecular weight heparin seems to be associated with improvement in the visual acuity and less adverse ocular outcomes. These benefits might differ in patients with central as opposed to branch retinal vein occlusion. Further studies are required to confirm these findings and clarify its benefits in specific subgroups of patients before definitive recommendations can be made.

Indexed as

AspirinHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetinal Vein OcclusionTreatment OutcomeVisual AcuityAspirinHeparin, Low-Molecular-Weight

Identifiers

PMID20305141
PMCPMC2930962
OpenAlexW2134625781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.