Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20304928›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2010

Oligomeric size of the m2 muscarinic receptor in live cells as determined by quantitative fluorescence resonance energy transfer.

Luca F Pisterzi, David B Jansma, John Georgiou, Michael J Woodside, Judy Tai-Chieh Chou, Stéphane Angers, Valerica Raicu, James W Wells

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Diffusion and Oligomerization States of the Muscarinic MThe journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024
    Article
  6. The MProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Muscarinic receptor oligomerization.Neuropharmacology · 2018
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Watching single proteins using engineered nanopores.Protein and peptide letters · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Luca F PisterziThe Leslie L Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3M2, Canada.
David B Jansma
John Georgiou
Michael J Woodside
Judy Tai-Chieh Chou
Stéphane Angers
Valerica Raicu
James W Wells
Hospital for Sick Children · CALunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAUniversity of Wisconsin–Milwaukee · US

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP 43990Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP 97978
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), measured by fluorescence intensity-based microscopy and fluorescence lifetime imaging, has been used to estimate the size of oligomers formed by the M(2) muscarinic cholinergic receptor. The approach is based on the relationship between the apparent FRET efficiency within an oligomer of specified size (n) and the pairwise FRET efficiency between a single donor and a single acceptor (E). The M(2) receptor was fused at the N terminus to enhanced green or yellow fluorescent protein and expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Emission spectra were analyzed by spectral deconvolution, and apparent efficiencies were estimated by donor-dequenching and acceptor-sensitized emission at different ratios of enhanced yellow fluorescent protein-M(2) receptor to enhanced green fluorescent protein-M(2) receptor. The data were interpreted in terms of a model that considers all combinations of donor and acceptor within a specified oligomer to obtain fitted values of E as follows: n = 2, 0.495 +/- 0.019; n = 4, 0.202 +/- 0.010; n = 6, 0.128 +/- 0.006; n = 8, 0.093 +/- 0.005. The pairwise FRET efficiency determined independently by fluorescence lifetime imaging was 0.20-0.24, identifying the M(2) receptor as a tetramer. The strategy described here yields an explicit estimate of oligomeric size on the basis of fluorescence properties alone. Its broader application could resolve the general question of whether G protein-coupled receptors exist as dimers or larger oligomers. The size of an oligomer has functional implications, and such information can be expected to contribute to an understanding of the signaling process.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial ProteinsCHO CellsCricetinaeCricetulusFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHumansKineticsLuminescent ProteinsMicroscopy, ConfocalModels, BiologicalModels, TheoreticalProtein Structure, TertiaryReceptor, Muscarinic M2Receptors, G-Protein-CoupledBacterial ProteinsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsLuminescent ProteinsReceptor, Muscarinic M2Receptors, G-Protein-Coupledyellow fluorescent protein, Bacteria

Identifiers

PMID20304928
PMCPMC2878013
OpenAlexW2055698508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.