ArticleLancet (London, England)2010
Carotid stenting: more risky than endarterectomy and often no better than medical treatment alone.
Article in Lancet (London, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Health-related quality of life after carotid stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: results from CREST (Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial).Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2011Trial
- Angioplasty in asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis vs. endarterectomy compared to best medical treatment: One-year interim results of SPACE-2.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2019Article
- Perioperative stroke: risk assessment, prevention and treatment.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2014Article
- [Primary and secondary prevention of stroke].Der Internist · 2012Article
- Time to rethink management strategies in asymptomatic carotid artery disease.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2011Review
- Secondary stroke prevention.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2010Review
- Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: Several Guidelines with Unclear Answers.Annals of Indian Academy of NeurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.