Trial reportBMC surgery2010
Anterior cervical discectomy with fusion in patients with cervical disc degeneration: a prospective outcome study of 258 patients (181 fused with autologous bone graft and 77 fused with a PEEK cage).
Trial report in BMC surgery, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- A systematic review of the use of expandable cages in the cervical spine.Neurosurgical review · 2016Pooled it
- Porous silicon nitride spacers versus PEEK cages for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical and radiological results of a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2017Trial
- Trial
- Headache relief after anterior cervical discectomy: post hoc analysis of a randomized investigational device exemption trial: clinical article.Journal of neurosurgery. Spine · 2014Trial
- The CASCADE trial: effectiveness of ceramic versus PEEK cages for anterior cervical discectomy with interbody fusion; protocol of a blinded randomized controlled trial.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2013Trial
- Beyond raw comparisons: Adjusted analysis reveals only minor inter-hospital differences in ACDF outcomes in Norway.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Article
- A nationwide registry study of surgical and patient-reported outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: Part 2 - cage with versus without local bone graft.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Observational
- The Impact of Surgeon Preference on Same-Day Discharge Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.Spine surgery and related research · 2025Article
- Hydroxyapatite/collagen composite graft for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a comparison with Iliac crest bone graft.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Effect of intervertebral foramen area and width on postoperative pain relief in patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy.BMC surgery · 2025Article
- Clinical Effectiveness of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using Tritanium C Anterior Cervical Cage vs. PEEK Cage.Spine surgery and related research · 2024Article
- Comparison of discover cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc diseases: A meta-analysis of prospective, randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Review
- Article
- Spinal Implant Osseointegration and the Role of 3D Printing: An Analysis and Review of the Literature.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- A Bibliometric Analysis of the Top 100 Cited Articles in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.Journal of pain research · 2022Article
- The outcomes of stand alone polyetheretherketone cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.International orthopaedics · 2021Review
- Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of bioactive glass ceramic to allograft bone for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with anterior plate fixation.Neurosurgical review · 2020Article
- Psychological predictors of quality of life after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for degenerative cervical spine disease.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) is challenging with respect to both patient selection and choice of surgical procedure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of ACDF, with respect to both patient selection and choice of surgical procedure: fusion with an autologous iliac crest graft (AICG) versus fusion with an artificial cage made of polyetheretherketone (PEEK).
methodsThis was a non-randomized prospective single-center outcome study of 258 patients who underwent ACDF for cervical disc degeneration (CDD). Fusion was attained with either tricortical AICG or PEEK cages without additional anterior plating, with treatment selected at surgeon's discretion. Radicular pain, neck-pain, headache and patient satisfaction with the treatment were scored using the visual analogue scale (VAS).
resultsThe median age was 47.5 (28.3-82.8) years, and 44% of patients were female. 59% had single-level ACDF, 40% had two level ACDF and 1% had three-level ACDF. Of the patients, 181 were fused with AICG and 77 with a PEEK-cage. After surgery, the patients showed a significant reduction in radicular pain (DeltaVAS = 3.05), neck pain (DeltaVAS = 2.30) and headache (DeltaVAS = 0.55). Six months after surgery, 48% of patients had returned to work: however 24% were still receiving workers' compensation.Using univariate and multivariate analyses we found that high preoperative pain intensity was significantly associated with a decrease in pain intensity after surgery, for all three pain categories. There were no significant correlations between pain relief and the following patient characteristics: fusion method (AICG or PEEK-cage), sex, age, number of levels fused, disc level fused, previous neck surgery (except for neck pain), previous neck trauma, or preoperative symptom duration. Two hundred out of the 256 (78%) patients evaluated the surgical result as successful. Only 27/256 (11%) classified the surgical result as a failure. Patient satisfaction was significantly associated with pain relief after surgery.
conclusionsACDF is an effective treatment for radicular pain in selected patients with CDD after six months follow up. Because of similar clinical outcomes and lack of donor site morbidity when using PEEK, we now prefer fusion with PEEK cage to AICG. Lengthy symptom duration was not a negative prognostic marker in our patient population. The number of patients who returned to work 6 months after surgery was lower than expected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.