Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20302321›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2010

Computational backbone mutagenesis of Abeta peptides: probing the role of backbone hydrogen bonds in aggregation.

Takako Takeda, Dmitri K Klimov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takako TakedaDepartment of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, George Mason University, Manassas, Virginia 20110, USA.
Dmitri K Klimov
George Mason University · US

Funding

Pathways of Alzehimer's amyloid assembly studied by computer simulationsR01AG028191 · NIA · GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY · PI KLIMOV, DMITRI KONSTANTINOVICH · 2007 to 2009
$490k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG028191NIA NIH HHS R01AG028191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using replica exchange molecular dynamics (REMD) and united atom implicit solvent model we examine the role of backbone hydrogen bonds (HBs) in Abeta aggregation. The importance of HBs appears to depend on the aggregation stage. The backbone HBs have little effect on the stability of Abeta dimers or on their aggregation interface. The HBs also do not play a critical role in initial binding of Abeta peptides to the amyloid fibril. Their elimination does not change the continuous character of Abeta binding nor its temperature. However, cancellation of HBs forming between incoming Abeta peptides and the fibril disrupts the locked fibril-like states in the bound peptides. Without the support of HBs, bound Abeta peptides form few long beta-strands on the fibril edge. As a result, the deletion of peptide-fibril HBs is expected to impede fibril growth. As for the peptides bound to Abeta fibril the deletion of interpeptide HBs reduces the beta propensity in the dimers making them less competent for amyloid assembly. These simulation findings together with the backbone mutagenesis experiments suggest that a viable strategy for arresting fibril growth is the disruption of interpeptide HBs.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationMutagenesisProtein MultimerizationAmyloidAmyloid beta-PeptidesHumansHydrogen BondingModels, MolecularMutationPeptide FragmentsProtein ConformationAmyloidAmyloid beta-PeptidesPeptide Fragments

Identifiers

PMID20302321
PMCPMC2862262
OpenAlexW2003926282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.