Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20300906›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2010

Impact of weight on long-term survival among patients without known coronary artery disease and a normal stress SPECT MPI.

Seth Uretsky, Azhar Supariwala, Padmakshi Singh, Prashanth Atluri, Surinder S Khokhar, Hari K Koppuravuri, Rajeev Joshi, Anupa Mandeva, Alan Rozanski

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Obesity paradox and heart failure.Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2021
    Review
  3. Poor Physical Fitness Performance as a Predictor of General Adiposity in Taiwanese Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  4. What is the value of stress (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin myocardial perfusion imaging for the assessment of very long-term outcome in obese patients?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2013
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Are people with normal radionuclide perfusion imaging studies better-off if they are obese?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Seth UretskyDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, St. Luke's and Roosevelt Hospitals, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 1111 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY, USA. suretsky@chpnet.org
Azhar Supariwala
Padmakshi Singh
Prashanth Atluri
Surinder S Khokhar
Hari K Koppuravuri
Rajeev Joshi
Anupa Mandeva
Alan Rozanski

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile obesity has been shown to be associated with a worse mortality, an "obesity paradox"--lower mortality in obese patients--has been noted among many patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The extent to which an obesity paradox operates among patients with only suspected CAD, is not well determined. METHODS AND

resultsA total of 3,673 patients (60 +/- 13 years, 36% males) with no history of heart disease and a normal stress SPECT were included in this study. Normal weight was defined as BMI of 18.5-24.9 kg x m(2); overweight 25-29.9 kg . m(2), obese >30 kg x m(2). The baseline clinical risk factors were recorded for each patient. The end point of the study was all-cause mortality. Of patients 942 (26%) were normal weight, 1,261 (34%) were overweight, and 1,470 (40%) were obese. Mean patient follow-up was 7.5 +/- 3 years. When compared to normal weight patients (event rate 3.2%/year), there was a lower incidence of death in the overweight (event rate 1.5%/year, P < .0001) and the obese (event rate 1.2%/year, P < .0001) groups. After controlling for baseline risk factors, using a reference HR = 1 for normal weight patients, there was a lower risk of death in the overweight (HR = .54, 95% CI .43-.7) and the obese groups (HR = .49, 95% CI .38-.63).

conclusionIn patients without known cardiac disease and a normal stress SPECT, overweight and obese patients had a lower rate of all-cause mortality compared to normal weight patients over long-term follow-up. This study substantially extends the spectrum of patients in whom the obesity paradox is present.

Indexed as

Body WeightExercise TestTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonAgedCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleObesityOverweightPrognosisRadiopharmaceuticalsRestRisk FactorsSurvival AnalysisTechnetium Tc 99m SestamibiRadiopharmaceuticalsTechnetium Tc 99m Sestamibi

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.