Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20300888›Full record

ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2010

Risks and mechanisms of oncological disease following stem cell transplantation.

Sergey V Anisimov, Asuka Morizane, Ana S Correia

Abstract readEvaluation StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sergey V AnisimovResearch Department of Cell and Gene Therapy, V. A. Almazov Federal Center for Heart, Blood & Endocrinology, Akkuratova Str. 2, Saint-Petersburg, 197341, Russia. grants@almazovcentre.ru
Asuka Morizane
Ana S Correia

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unique biological properties of stem cells make them a precious source of cell material for treatment of a number of pathological conditions. Among issues inhibiting transition of stem cell technologies to the clinics, the risk of oncological complications of stem cell-based therapies is the most critical. A massive amount of clinical and experimental data demonstrates that both hematological (including acute and chronic myeloid leukemia) and non-hematological (including teratoma and non-teratoma tumors) malignancies could arise from donor stem cells of different types. A wide spectrum of mechanisms could underlie the development of oncological disease in recipients, including: i) blast transformation of proliferating donor stem cells under persistent action of certain factors in the recipient, thus causing de novo malignancies; ii) contamination of donor cell material with malignant cells; iii) transmission of particular viral subtypes with donor stem cells, combined with immunosuppression therapy effects; iv) uncontrollable proliferation of residual undifferentiated stem cells of various plasticity; and v) karyotypic instability in stem cells following prolonged culturing/expansion in vitro. Potential preventive strategies are diverse and include i) high-throughput cell sorting-based strategies; ii) introduction of suicide genes into the donor stem cell genome; iii) application of apoptosis-inducing epigenetic factors; and some other options.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansImmunosuppression TherapyModels, BiologicalNeoplasmsRisk AssessmentStem Cell TransplantationTransplantation Conditioning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.