Trial reportRheumatology international2010
Polymyalgia rheumatica and vertebral fractures: a 1-year pilot controlled study.
Trial report in Rheumatology international, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient-reported outcomes in trials of patients with polymyalgia rheumatica: a systematic literature review.Rheumatology international · 2016Pooled it
- Retrospective Analysis of Factors Associated with Fracture in 714 Patients with Polymyalgia Rheumatica.International journal of rheumatology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
No data exist about the possibility that vertebral fracture in PMR patients could be independent of steroid therapy. For this reason, we aimed to investigate this topic by a case cohort study with a 1-year follow-up for each patient. We selected ten consecutive patients who experienced vertebral fractures (VF-group) during the first month of 1-year follow-up period and without any other significant associated condition. As a control group we studied ten control patients, without vertebral fractures and with a follow-up of 1 year, randomly selected among a larger group of patients affected by polymyalgia rheumatica. The following data were analysed: eritrosedimention rate (ESR), visual analogical scale score (VAS), methyprednisolone daily dosage. Each patient had been monthly evaluated by the aforementioned clinical and laboratoristic parameters during the 1-year follow-up period. The VF-group resulted with a higher and statistically significant median corticosteroid 12-month total dosage [mean 3,480 mg (95%CI 2,805-3,030) vs. 2,760 mg (2,666.25-3,247.5)]. The VF-group had statistically significant higher ESR and VAS AUC when compared to control group (median ESR AUC, 484.75 vs. 288.25; P = 0.0001; median VAS AUC, 70.75 vs. 43.5 P < 0.0001); ESR at the baseline (cut-off >80 mm) showed a specificity of 90% (95%CI 56-100) and sensitivity of 70% (95%CI 35-93). VAS difference from first to second month (cut-off <or=3) showed a specificity of 90% (95%CI 56-100) and sensitivity of 80% (95% CI 44-97). Our results point out that vertebral fracture might be predicted from commonly used laboratory (ESR) and clinical (VAS) findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.