ArticlePLoS computational biology2010
Quantitative comparison of catalytic mechanisms and overall reactions in convergently evolved enzymes: implications for classification of enzyme function.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional profiling of the sequence stockpile: a protein pair-based assessment of in silico prediction tools.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- NICEdrug.ch, a workflow for rational drug design and systems-level analysis of drug metabolism.eLife · 2021Article
- Functional Analogy in Human Metabolism: Enzymes with Different Biological Roles or Functional Redundancy?Genome biology and evolution · 2017Article
- The Classification and Evolution of Enzyme Function.Biophysical journal · 2015Review
- Why do Sequence Signatures Predict Enzyme Mechanism? Homology versus Chemistry.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2015Article
- Profiling the orphan enzymes.Biology direct · 2014Review
- The evolution of enzyme function in the isomerases.Current opinion in structural biology · 2014Review
- The mode of action of recombinant Mycobacterium tuberculosis shikimate kinase: kinetics and thermodynamics analyses.PloS one · 2013Article
- Is EC class predictable from reaction mechanism?BMC bioinformatics · 2012Article
- MACiE: exploring the diversity of biochemical reactions.Nucleic acids research · 2012Article
- Enzyme informatics.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2012Review
- Exploring the evolution of novel enzyme functions within structurally defined protein superfamilies.PLoS computational biology · 2012Article
- Characterizing the complexity of enzymes on the basis of their mechanisms and structures with a bio-computational analysis.The FEBS journal · 2011Review
- Computational Approaches for Automated Classification of Enzyme Sequences.Journal of proteomics & bioinformatics · 2011Article
- Toward mechanistic classification of enzyme functions.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2011Review
- Protein function prediction: towards integration of similarity metrics.Current opinion in structural biology · 2011Review
- Article
- Article
- Predicting the network of substrate-enzyme-product triads by combining compound similarity and functional domain composition.BMC bioinformatics · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Functionally analogous enzymes are those that catalyze similar reactions on similar substrates but do not share common ancestry, providing a window on the different structural strategies nature has used to evolve required catalysts. Identification and use of this information to improve reaction classification and computational annotation of enzymes newly discovered in the genome projects would benefit from systematic determination of reaction similarities. Here, we quantified similarity in bond changes for overall reactions and catalytic mechanisms for 95 pairs of functionally analogous enzymes (non-homologous enzymes with identical first three numbers of their EC codes) from the MACiE database. Similarity of overall reactions was computed by comparing the sets of bond changes in the transformations from substrates to products. For similarity of mechanisms, sets of bond changes occurring in each mechanistic step were compared; these similarities were then used to guide global and local alignments of mechanistic steps. Using this metric, only 44% of pairs of functionally analogous enzymes in the dataset had significantly similar overall reactions. For these enzymes, convergence to the same mechanism occurred in 33% of cases, with most pairs having at least one identical mechanistic step. Using our metric, overall reaction similarity serves as an upper bound for mechanistic similarity in functional analogs. For example, the four carbon-oxygen lyases acting on phosphates (EC 4.2.3) show neither significant overall reaction similarity nor significant mechanistic similarity. By contrast, the three carboxylic-ester hydrolases (EC 3.1.1) catalyze overall reactions with identical bond changes and have converged to almost identical mechanisms. The large proportion of enzyme pairs that do not show significant overall reaction similarity (56%) suggests that at least for the functionally analogous enzymes studied here, more stringent criteria could be used to refine definitions of EC sub-subclasses for improved discrimination in their classification of enzyme reactions. The results also indicate that mechanistic convergence of reaction steps is widespread, suggesting that quantitative measurement of mechanistic similarity can inform approaches for functional annotation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.