Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20300216›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2010

Symmetry breaking in biology.

Rong Li, Bruce Bowerman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Patterning of the cell cortex by Rho GTPases.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Spontaneous divergence of disease status in an economic epidemiological game.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. The steering gaits of sperm.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  18. Mechanochemical Control of Symmetry Breaking in theFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rong LiStowers Institute for Medical Research, 1000 East 50th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64110, USA. rli@stowers.org
Bruce Bowerman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Symmetry breaking is essential for cell movement, polarity, and developmental patterning. Amplification of initial asymmetry is key to the conserved mechanisms involved.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiologyBody PatterningCytoskeletonGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHumansModels, BiologicalSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID20300216
PMCPMC2829966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.