Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20300205›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2010

The nuclear envelope.

Martin W Hetzer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 185 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
185citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

185 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. An Unbiased Drug Screen in a Drosophila Model ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Nucleoskeletal Proteins in Early Embryogenesis.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

125 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Martin W HetzerSalk Institute for Biological Studies, Molecular and Cell Biology Laboratory, La Jolla, California 92037, USA. hetzer@salk.edu

Funding

Nuclear Membrane Fusion in Xenopus Egg ExtractsR01GM073994 · NIGMS · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI HETZER, MARTIN W · 2006 to 2010
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM073994NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM073994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nuclear envelope (NE) is a highly regulated membrane barrier that separates the nucleus from the cytoplasm in eukaryotic cells. It contains a large number of different proteins that have been implicated in chromatin organization and gene regulation. Although the nuclear membrane enables complex levels of gene expression, it also poses a challenge when it comes to cell division. To allow access of the mitotic spindle to chromatin, the nucleus of metazoans must completely disassemble during mitosis, generating the need to re-establish the nuclear compartment at the end of each cell division. Here, I summarize our current understanding of the dynamic remodeling of the NE during the cell cycle.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell CycleCell NucleusCell ProliferationChromatinCytoplasmHumansMitosisModels, BiologicalNuclear EnvelopeSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSpindle ApparatusChromatin

Identifiers

PMID20300205
PMCPMC2829960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.