Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20299633›Full record

Trial reportChest2010

Patient-clinician communication: associations with important health outcomes among veterans with COPD.

Christopher G Slatore, Laura M Cecere, Lynn F Reinke, Linda Ganzini, Edmunds M Udris, Brianna R Moss, Chris L Bryson, J Randall Curtis, David H Au

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Chest, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Is Disease Stability an Attainable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Treatment Goal?American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christopher G SlatoreHealth Services Research and Development, Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR 97239, USA. slatore@ohsu.edu
Laura M Cecere
Lynn F Reinke
Linda Ganzini
Edmunds M Udris
Brianna R Moss
Chris L Bryson
J Randall Curtis
David H Au

Funding

Effect of NSAIDs on risk of Incident Lung Cancer: a cohort studyF32CA130328 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SLATORE, CHRISTOPHER G. · 2007 to 2008
$116k
NCI NIH HHS CA130328NCI NIH HHS F32 CA130328
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh quality patient-clinician communication is widely advocated, but little is known about which health outcomes are associated with communication for patients with COPD.

methodsUsing a cross-sectional study of 342 veterans enrolled in a randomized controlled trial, we evaluated the association of communication, measured with the quality of communication (QOC) instrument, with subject-reported quality of clinician care, breathing problem confidence, and general self-rated health. We measured these associations using general estimating equations and adjusted odds ratios (OR) of patient-reported outcomes associated with one-point changes in QOC scores.

resultsNearly one-half of the subjects reported receiving the best imaginable care (47%), whereas fewer reported being confident with their breathing problems all the time (29%) or in very good or excellent health (15%). General communication was associated with best-imagined quality of care (OR, 4.29; 95% CI, 2.84-6.48; P < .001) and confidence in dealing with breathing problems all the time (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.34-2.25; P < .001) but not general self-rated health (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.92-1.55; P = .19). Specific clinician behaviors with larger associations with higher quality care included listening, caring, and attentiveness. The associations between general communication and quality care increased over time (P for interaction .03).

conclusionsCommunication between patients and clinicians is associated with quality of care and confidence in dealing with breathing problems, and this association may change over time. Attention to specific communication strategies may lead to improvements in the care of patients with COPD.

Indexed as

CommunicationPhysician-Patient RelationsAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CarePatient SatisfactionPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveSelf-AssessmentTreatment OutcomeVeterans

Identifiers

PMID20299633
PMCPMC2940066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.