Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20298764›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2010

Neural heterogeneities and stimulus properties affect burst coding in vivo.

O Avila-Akerberg, R Krahe, M J Chacron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. On the Validity of Neural Mass Models.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  8. Novel Functions of Feedback in Electrosensory Processing.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Optimized Parallel Coding of Second-Order Stimulus Features by Heterogeneous Neural Populations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Neural heterogeneities determine response characteristics to second-, but not first-order stimulus features.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Parallel coding of first- and second-order stimulus attributes by midbrain electrosensory neurons.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

O Avila-AkerbergDepartment of Physics, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
R Krahe
M J Chacron

Funding

CIHR 82838-1CIHR 83338-1CIHR 83338-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many neurons tend to fire clusters of action potentials called bursts followed by quiescence in response to sensory input. While the mechanisms that underlie burst firing are generally well understood in vitro, the functional role of these bursts in generating behavioral responses to sensory input in vivo are less clear. Pyramidal cells within the electrosensory lateral line lobe (ELL) of weakly electric fish offer an attractive model system for studying the coding properties of burst firing, because the anatomy and physiology of the electrosensory circuitry are well understood, and the burst mechanism of ELL pyramidal cells has been thoroughly characterized in vitro. We investigated the coding properties of bursts generated by these cells in vivo in response to mimics of behaviorally relevant sensory input. We found that heterogeneities within the pyramidal cell population had quantitative but not qualitative effects on burst coding for the low frequency components of broadband time varying input. Moreover, spatially localized stimuli mimicking, for example, prey tended to elicit more bursts than spatially global stimuli mimicking conspecific-related stimuli. We also found small but significant correlations between burst attributes such as the number of spikes per burst or the interspike interval during the burst and stimulus attributes such as stimulus amplitude or slope. These correlations were much weaker in magnitude than those observed in vitro. More surprisingly, our results show that correlations between burst and stimulus attributes actually decreased in magnitude when we used low frequency stimuli that are expected to promote burst firing. We propose that this discrepancy is attributable to differences between ELL pyramidal cell burst firing under in vivo and in vitro conditions.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsElectric StimulationGymnotiformesInformation TheoryPyramidal Cells

Identifiers

PMID20298764
PMCPMC4529318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.