ArticleDrug safety2010
Adverse drug reactions in the paediatric population in Denmark: a retrospective analysis of reports made to the Danish Medicines Agency from 1998 to 2007.
Article in Drug safety, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Adverse drug reactions associated with asthma medications in children: systematic review of clinical trials.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2014Pooled it
- European guidelines on managing adverse effects of medication for ADHD.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2011Guideline
- Parental reporting of adverse drug events and other drug-related problems in children in Finland.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2013Trial
- Medication errors in malaria management in children: insights from pharmacovigilance data in the Democratic Republic of Congo.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2025Article
- Pediatric Drug Safety Surveillance: A 10-Year Analysis of Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Data in Calabria, Southern Italy.Drug safety · 2022Review
- Under-Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions in Finland and Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on How to Improve Reporting.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Descriptive analysis of adverse drug reaction reports in children and adolescents from Germany: frequently reported reactions and suspected drugs.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2021Article
- Analysis of the reporting of adverse drug reactions in children and adolescents in Germany in the time period from 2000 to 2019.PloS one · 2021Article
- Pharmacovigilance Reports Received from Children and Young People, and Development of Information to Aid Future Reporting from this Age Group.Paediatric drugs · 2020Article
- Reported adverse drug reactions in women and men: Aggregated evidence from globally collected individual case reports during half a century.EClinicalMedicine · 2019Article
- The Role of an Interventional Program for Improving Pharmacovigilance at a Pediatric Facility.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Article
- Article
- Reported Adverse Drug Reactions in Infants: A Nationwide Analysis in Malaysia.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2017Article
- Neonatal adverse drug reactions: an analysis of reports to the French pharmacovigilance database.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2016Article
- Adverse drug reactions in hospitalized Colombian children.Colombia medica (Cali, Colombia) · 2016Article
- Drug Safety Monitoring in Children: Performance of Signal Detection Algorithms and Impact of Age Stratification.Drug safety · 2016Article
- A Retrospective Analysis of Spontaneous Adverse Drug Reactions Reports Relating to Paediatric Patients.PloS one · 2016Article
- Use of administrative hospital database to identify adverse drug reactions in a Pediatric University Hospital.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2014Article
- Comparison between paediatric and adult suspected adverse drug reactions reported to the European medicines agency: implications for pharmacovigilance.Paediatric drugs · 2014Article
- Adverse drug reactions in children reported by European consumers from 2007 to 2011.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe potential risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the paediatric population has become a public health concern and regulatory agencies in Europe and the US have acknowledged that there is a need for more research in this area. Spontaneous reporting systems can provide important new information about ADRs.
objectiveTo characterize ADRs in children reported in Denmark over a period of one decade.
methodsWe analysed ADRs reported to the Danish Medicines Agency from 1998 to 2007 for individuals aged from birth to 17 years. Data were analysed with respect to time, age and sex, category of ADR (System Organ Class [SOC]), seriousness, suspected medicines (level 2 of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical [ATC] Classification System) and type of reporter.
results2437 ADR reports corresponding to 4500 ADRs were analysed. On average, 234 ADR reports were submitted annually, corresponding to approximately two ADRs per report. From 2003 to 2005, an increasing number of ADRs submitted per report were observed, but after 2005 the reporting rate decreased. One-half of ADRs were reported for infants from birth to 2 years of age. Similar total numbers of ADRs were reported for boys and girls. The majority of ADRs reported were from the following SOCs: general disorders and administration site conditions (31%), skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (18%) and nervous system disorders (15%). Reports encompassed medicines from ATC group J: vaccines and anti-infectives for systemic use (65%); and ATC group N: nervous system (17%). On average, 42% of ADRs were classified as serious. ATC group N had the highest proportion of ADRs that were classified as serious. Although physicians reported approximately 90% of the ADRs, a relatively large proportion of serious ADRs were reported by other sources.
conclusionIn Denmark, the ADR reporting rate in the paediatric population has declined since 2005. The majority of ADRs reported in young children were reported for vaccines and anti-infectives, but also a high number of serious ADRs were reported for medicines from ATC group N. The Danish Medicines Agency should monitor prescribing patterns more tightly to identify potential risks in the paediatric population in relation to the evolving pattern of medicine use among children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20297864What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.