Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20238343›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010

Intrapartum fetal scalp lactate sampling for fetal assessment in the presence of a non-reassuring fetal heart rate trace.

Christine E East, Leo R Leader, Penelope Sheehan, Naomi E Henshall, Paul B Colditz

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Fetal pulse oximetry for fetal assessment in labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Short and long term prognosis in perinatal asphyxia: An update.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christine E EastDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Pregnancy Research Centre, Department of Perinatal Medicine, Royal Women's Hospital, 20 Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 3052.
Leo R Leader
Penelope Sheehan
Naomi E Henshall
Paul B Colditz

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFetal blood sampling for lactate estimation may be considered following identification of an abnormal or non-reassuring fetal heart rate pattern. The smaller volume of blood required for this test, compared with the more traditional pH estimation, may improve sampling rates. The appropriate use of this practice mandates systematic review of its safety and clinical effectiveness prior to widespread introduction.

objectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness and risks of fetal scalp lactate sampling in the assessment of fetal well-being during labour, compared with no testing or alternative testing. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (November 2009). SELECTION CRITERIA: All published and unpublished randomised and quasi-randomised trials that compared fetal scalp lactate testing with no testing or alternative testing to evaluate fetal status in the presence of a non-reassuring cardiotocograph during labour. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors assessed the studies independently. MAIN

resultsThe two identified randomised trials considered outcomes for 3348 mother-baby pairs allocated to either lactate or pH estimation of fetal blood samples in labour. There were no statistically significant differences for any fetal/neonatal/infant outcomes, including low Apgar score at five minutes, admission to neonatal intensive care units or neonatal encephalopathy, or for low umbilical arterial pH, base deficit or metabolic acidaemia. There was a statistically higher success rate for lactate compared with pH estimation (risk ratio 1.10, 95% confidence interval 1.08 to 1.12, n = 2992). There were no significant between-group differences in mode of birth or operative birth for non-reassuring fetal status. No studies reported outcomes of maternal satisfaction with fetal monitoring, anxiety, length of hospital stay or economic analysis. AUTHORS'

conclusionsWhen further testing to assess fetal well-being in labour is indicated, fetal scalp blood lactate estimation is more likely to be successfully undertaken than pH estimation. Action cut-off lactate values need to consider the lactate meter used. Further studies may consider sub-group analysis by gestational age, the stage of labour and sampling within a prolonged second stage of labour. Additionally, future studies may address longer-term neonatal outcomes, maternal satisfaction with intrapartum fetal monitoring and an economic analysis.

Indexed as

AcidosisBiomarkersBlood Specimen CollectionCardiotocographyFemaleFetal DistressFetal HypoxiaHeart Rate, FetalHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationLabor, ObstetricLactic AcidPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicScalpBiomarkersLactic Acid

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.