SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010
Intrapartum fetal scalp lactate sampling for fetal assessment in the presence of a non-reassuring fetal heart rate trace.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Intrapartum fetal scalp lactate sampling for fetal assessment in the presence of a non-reassuring fetal heart rate trace.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Fetal pulse oximetry for fetal assessment in labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Vibroacoustic stimulation for fetal assessment in labour in the presence of a nonreassuring fetal heart rate trace.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of fetal scalp blood lactate measurement to reduce caesarean sections during labour: the Flamingo trial [ACTRN12611000172909].BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2015Trial
- Feasibility and safety of intrapartum foetal pulse oximetry using a disposable scalp probe: a cross-sectional study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Determination of Foetal Scalp Blood Sampling pH as an Indicator of Loss of Foetal Well-Being in Women Undergoing Caesarean Section.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- MR imaging and outcome in neonatal HIBD models are correlated with sex: the value of diffusion tensor MR imaging and diffusion kurtosis MR imaging.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Validation of Altered Umbilical Cord Blood MicroRNA Expression in Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy.JAMA neurology · 2019Article
- Lactate point-of-care testing for acidosis: Cross-comparison of two devices with routine laboratory results.Practical laboratory medicine · 2016Article
- Short and long term prognosis in perinatal asphyxia: An update.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFetal blood sampling for lactate estimation may be considered following identification of an abnormal or non-reassuring fetal heart rate pattern. The smaller volume of blood required for this test, compared with the more traditional pH estimation, may improve sampling rates. The appropriate use of this practice mandates systematic review of its safety and clinical effectiveness prior to widespread introduction.
objectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness and risks of fetal scalp lactate sampling in the assessment of fetal well-being during labour, compared with no testing or alternative testing. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (November 2009). SELECTION CRITERIA: All published and unpublished randomised and quasi-randomised trials that compared fetal scalp lactate testing with no testing or alternative testing to evaluate fetal status in the presence of a non-reassuring cardiotocograph during labour. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors assessed the studies independently. MAIN
resultsThe two identified randomised trials considered outcomes for 3348 mother-baby pairs allocated to either lactate or pH estimation of fetal blood samples in labour. There were no statistically significant differences for any fetal/neonatal/infant outcomes, including low Apgar score at five minutes, admission to neonatal intensive care units or neonatal encephalopathy, or for low umbilical arterial pH, base deficit or metabolic acidaemia. There was a statistically higher success rate for lactate compared with pH estimation (risk ratio 1.10, 95% confidence interval 1.08 to 1.12, n = 2992). There were no significant between-group differences in mode of birth or operative birth for non-reassuring fetal status. No studies reported outcomes of maternal satisfaction with fetal monitoring, anxiety, length of hospital stay or economic analysis. AUTHORS'
conclusionsWhen further testing to assess fetal well-being in labour is indicated, fetal scalp blood lactate estimation is more likely to be successfully undertaken than pH estimation. Action cut-off lactate values need to consider the lactate meter used. Further studies may consider sub-group analysis by gestational age, the stage of labour and sampling within a prolonged second stage of labour. Additionally, future studies may address longer-term neonatal outcomes, maternal satisfaction with intrapartum fetal monitoring and an economic analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20238343What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.