SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010
Fluvoxamine versus other anti-depressive agents for depression.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 211 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis, investigating dose and time of fluvoxamine treatment efficacy for COVID-19 clinical deterioration, death, and Long-COVID complications.Scientific reports · 2024Pooled it
- New generation antidepressants for depression in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Paroxetine versus other anti-depressive agents for depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in depression in adults: a systematic review.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2014Pooled it
- Valproic acid, valproate and divalproex in the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Fluoxetine versus other types of pharmacotherapy for depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Newer generation antidepressants for depressive disorders in children and adolescents.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Duloxetine versus other anti-depressive agents for depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Citalopram versus other anti-depressive agents for depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012Pooled it
- Mirtazapine versus other antidepressive agents for depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011Pooled it
- Sertraline versus other antidepressive agents for depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Milnacipran versus other antidepressive agents for depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009Pooled it
- Escitalopram versus other antidepressive agents for depression.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009Pooled it
- Evidence-Based Pharmacotherapies for Major Depressive Disorder: A Clinical Update.Psychopharmacology bulletin · 2026Review
- Evaluating the Impact of CYP2D6 Phenotype on Fluvoxamine Pharmacokinetics in Geriatric Patients Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- An Overview of the Systematic Reviews About the Efficacy of Fluvoxamine on Depression.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Fluvoxamine: First comprehensive insights into its molecular characteristics and inclusion complexation with β-cyclodextrin.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2025Article
- Fluvoxamine inhibits Th1 and Th17 polarization and function by repressing glycolysis to attenuate autoimmune progression in type 1 diabetes.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Effect of fluvoxamine on plasma interleukin-6 in patients with major depressive disorder: a prospective follow-up study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFluvoxamine, one of the oldest selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), is prescribed to patients with major depression in many countries. Several studies have previously reviewed the efficacy and tolerability of fluvoxamine for the treatment of major depression. However, these reviews are now outdated.
objectivesOur objective is to evaluate the effectiveness, tolerability and side effect profile of fluvoxamine for major depression in comparison with other anti-depressive agents, including tricyclics (TCAs), heterocyclics, other SSRIs, SNRIs, other newer agents and other conventional psychotropic drugs. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Controlled Trials Register. Trial databases and ongoing trial registers in North America, Europe, Japan and Australia, were handsearched for randomised controlled trials. We checked reference lists of the articles included in the review, previous systematic reviews and major textbooks of affective disorder for published reports and citations of unpublished research. The date of last search was 31 August 2008. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised controlled trials, published in any language, that compared fluvoxamine with any other active antidepressants in the acute phase treatment of major depression. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two independent review authors inspected citations and abstracts, obtained papers, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. We analysed dichotomous data using odds ratios (ORs) and continuous data using the standardised mean difference (SMD). A random effects model was used to combine studies. MAIN
resultsA total of 54 randomised controlled trials (n = 5122) were included. No strong evidence was found to indicate that fluvoxamine was either superior or inferior to other antidepressants regarding response, remission and tolerability. However, differing side effect profiles were evident, especially with regard to gastrointestinal side effects of fluvoxamine when compared to other antidepressants. For example, fluvoxamine was generally associated with a higher incidence of vomiting/nausea (versus imipramine, OR 2.23, CI 1.59 to 3.14; versus clomipramine, OR 2.13, CI 1.06 to 4.27; versus amitriptyline, OR 2.86, CI 1.31 to 2.63). AUTHORS'
conclusionsWe found no strong evidence that fluvoxamine was either superior or inferior to any other antidepressants in terms of efficacy and tolerability in the acute phase treatment of depression. However, differing side effect profiles were evident. Based on these findings, we conclude that clinicians should focus on practical or clinically relevant considerations, including these differences in side effect profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.