Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20238315›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010

Intravenous immunoglobulin for suspected or subsequently proven infection in neonates.

Arne Ohlsson, Janet Lacy

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Intravenous immunoglobulin for suspected or proven infection in neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Recombinant human activated protein C for severe sepsis in neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  4. Neonatal Sepsis-Newer Insights.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Intravenous Immunoglobulin G Treatment in ABO Hemolytic Disease of the Newborn, is it Myth or Real?Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2014
    Article
  12. Neonatal infectious diseases: evaluation of neonatal sepsis.Pediatric clinics of North America · 2013
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arne OhlssonDepartments of Paediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1X5.
Janet Lacy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfections are important causes of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Maternal transport of immunoglobulins to the fetus mainly occurs after 32 weeks gestation and endogenous synthesis begins several months after birth. The administration of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) may improve immune function by providing IgG that can bind to cell surface receptors, provide opsonic activity, activate complement, promote antibody dependent cytotoxicity, and improve neutrophilic chemo luminescence.

objectivesTo assess the effect of IVIG on mortality/morbidity caused by suspected infection in neonates and in those neonates who had suspected infection on study entry and later were confirmed as being infected. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, the reference lists of identified studies, meta-analyses and personal files in December 2009. SELECTION CRITERIA: We selected randomized or quasi-randomised controlled trials of IVIG for the treatment of suspected bacterial/fungal infection compared to placebo or no intervention in newborn infants (< 28 days old). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Statistical analyses included Typical Relative Risk (RR), Risk Difference (RD), weighted mean difference (WMD), the number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) (all with with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and the I(2) statistic to examine statistical heterogeneity. MAIN

resultsThe updated search identified one new study. Ten studies of variable quality undertaken in 8 countries are included in this review.Mortality in infants with clinically suspected infection was reduced following IVIG treatment [7 studies (n = 378); typical RR 0.58 (95% CI; 0.38, 0.89); typical RD -0.10 (95% CI; - 0.18, -0.03); NNTB 10 (95% CI; 6, 33); I(2) = 0%]. Mortality in cases of subsequently proven infection was reduced [seven trials (n = 262); typical RR 0.55 (95% CI; 0.31, 0.98);I(2) = 0%]. AUTHORS'

conclusionsBecause of concerns about study quality, there is still insufficient evidence to support the routine administration of IVIG to prevent mortality in infants with suspected or subsequently proved neonatal infection. A large study of the effectiveness of IVIG in neonates with suspected infection has recently been completed. Results of the International Neonatal Immunotherapy Study (INIS trial), which enrolled 3,493 infants, are expected to be published in 2010 (http://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk). The results of that trial should establish the usefulness of IVIG for suspected infection in newborns.

Indexed as

HumansImmunoglobulins, IntravenousImmunologic FactorsInfant, NewbornInfectionsLength of StayRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSepsisTreatment OutcomeImmunoglobulins, IntravenousImmunologic Factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.