Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20238311›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2010

Interventions to change the behaviour of health professionals and the organisation of care to promote weight reduction in overweight and obese people.

Gerd Flodgren, Katherine Deane, Heather O Dickinson, Sara Kirk, Hugh Alberti, Fiona R Beyer, James G Brown, Tarra L Penney, Carolyn D Summerbell, Martin P Eccles

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
15.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03725774 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

The SUMAMOS EXCELENCIA Project: Assessment of Implementation of Best Practices in a National Health System

TypeinterventionalSponsorTeresa Moreno CasbasRan2016 to 2017Enrolled300ConditionsAge ProblemArmsGRIP (Getting Research into Practice) model
NCT05466656 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

SUMAMOS EXCELENCIA Project: Assessment of Implementation of Best Practices in a National Health System (Second Edition)

TypeinterventionalSponsorTeresa Moreno CasbasRan2021 to 2024Enrolled115ConditionsPain, Incontinence, Urinary, Obesity, Childhood, BreastfeedingArmsContinuous quality improvement cycle model
NCT06522529 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

SUMAMOS EXCELENCIA Project: Assessment of Implementation of Best Practices in a National Health System (Thrid Edition)

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIRan2024 to 2026Enrolled400ConditionsPain, Obesity, Childhood, Breast Feeding, Incontinence, UrinaryArmsMultifaceted implementation strategy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Dietary advice for reducing cardiovascular risk.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. SUMAMOS EXCELENCIAHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  17. What works and why in the identification and referral of adults with comorbid obesity in primary care: A realist review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Gerd FlodgrenInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, 21 Claremont Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, NE2 4AA.
Katherine Deane
Heather O Dickinson
Sara Kirk
Hugh Alberti
Fiona R Beyer
James G Brown
Tarra L Penney
Carolyn D Summerbell
Martin P Eccles
Dalhousie University · CANewcastle University · GBDurham University · GBMiddlesbrough College · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of obesity is increasing globally and will, if left unchecked, have major implications for both population health and costs to health services.

objectivesTo assess the effectiveness of strategies to change the behaviour of health professionals and the organisation of care to promote weight reduction in overweight and obese people. SEARCH STRATEGY: We updated the search for primary studies in the following databases, which were all interrogated from the previous (version 2) search date to May 2009: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (which at this time incorporated all EPOC Specialised Register material) (The Cochrane Library 2009, Issue 1), MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), and PsycINFO (Ovid). We identified further potentially relevant studies from the reference lists of included studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared routine provision of care with interventions aimed either at changing the behaviour of healthcare professionals or the organisation of care to promote weight reduction in overweight or obese adults. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality. MAIN

resultsWe included six RCTs, involving more than 246 health professionals and 1324 overweight or obese patients. Four of the trials targeted professionals and two targeted the organisation of care. Most of the studies had methodological or reporting weaknesses indicating a risk of bias.Meta-analysis of three trials that evaluated educational interventions aimed at GPs suggested that, compared to standard care, such interventions could reduce the average weight of patients after a year (by 1.2 kg, 95% CI -0.4 to 2.8 kg); however, there was moderate unexplained heterogeneity between their results (I(2) = 41%). One trial found that reminders could change doctors' practice, resulting in a significant reduction in weight among men (by 11.2 kg, 95% CI 1.7 to 20.7 kg) but not among women (who reduced weight by 1.3 kg, 95% CI -4.1 to 6.7 kg). One trial found that patients may lose more weight after a year if the care was provided by a dietitian (by 5.6 kg, 95% CI 4.8 to 6.4 kg) or by a doctor-dietitian team (by 6 kg, 95% CI 5 to 7 kg), as compared with standard care. One trial found no significant difference between standard care and either mail or phone interventions in reducing patients' weight. AUTHORS'

conclusionsMost of the included trials had methodological or reporting weaknesses and were heterogeneous in terms of participants, interventions, outcomes, and settings, so we cannot draw any firm conclusions about the effectiveness of the interventions. All of the evaluated interventions would need further investigation before it was possible to recommend them as effective strategies.

Indexed as

AdultBody WeightControlled Clinical Trials as TopicDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansMaleObesityOverweightPatient Education as TopicProfessional PracticeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWeight Loss

Identifiers

PMID20238311
PMCPMC4235843
OpenAlexW2170008268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.