Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20238202›Full record

ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2010

[Incisional hernia - how do I do it? Standard surgical approach].

J Conze, M Binnebösel, K Junge, V Schumpelick

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Technical principles of incisional hernia surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2016
    Article
  10. Current Status of Hernia Centres Around the Globe.The Indian journal of surgery · 2015
    Article
  11. [Use of biological meshes in abdominal wall reconstruction. Results of a survey in Germany].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. [Abdominal wall components separation method for closure of complicated abdominal hernias].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2012
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J ConzeKlinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum der RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074 Aachen. jconze@ukaachen.de
M Binnebösel
K Junge
V Schumpelick
Universitätsklinikum Aachen · DERWTH Aachen University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various techniques for repair of an incisional hernia are available for the surgeon. Conventional suture techniques are quick and easy to perform but they are associated with an unacceptable rate of recurrence and therefore should only be used in exceptional cases. An underlying systemic disturbance of collagen metabolism is assumed to exist in patients with an incisional hernia. In such patients the mechanisms of wound healing and remodeling of the abdominal wall following laparotomy are insufficient, which necessitates reinforcement of the abdominal wall with a non-resorbable alloplastic mesh prosthesis to enable a long-term cure. The implantation of such meshes can be carried out laparoscopically or by an open approach. The gold standard of open repair techniques is the retromuscular placement of a mesh prosthesis. The retromuscular mesh placement as a reinforcement of the abdominal wall (augmentation) must be categorically differentiated into the abdominal wall replacement by mesh bridging. In this technique the mesh is likewise placed in the retromuscular space, however a complete closure of the ventral fascia is not necessary. Retromuscular augmentation enables an extra-peritoneal placement of the prosthesis, an optimization of tissue integration by plane coverage of the prosthesis by well vascularized muscular tissue and a sufficient overlap in cranio-caudal and lateral directions. Mesh fixation is best made with absorbable suture material but is better suited for technical simplification. The use of a prophylactic drainage should be decided depending on the individual patient's risk factors, because sufficient evidence-based data are currently not available. If augmentation is not possible bridging is necessary and then the mesh has to be fixed without underlying support. Current data reveal that the recurrence rate following incisional hernia repair by retromuscular mesh augmentation has decreased promisingly in comparison to simple suture techniques. In total the recurrence rate following retromuscular mesh placement ranges between 2 and 12%. Current results of prospective randomized multicentre trials are not available. However, it is to be expected that further development of mesh materials as well as improvement of surgical techniques with avoidance of typical pitfalls will lead to further reduction of the recurrence rate with an improvement in patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

AbdomenAbdominal MusclesAbdominal WallBioprosthesisFasciotomyHernia, VentralHumansLaparoscopyPostoperative ComplicationsProsthesis ImplantationReoperationSurgical MeshSuture Techniques

Identifiers

PMID20238202
OpenAlexW1483487951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.