Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20238142›Full record

Trial reportInvestigational new drugs2011

Phase II study of irinotecan/S-1 combination chemotherapy for patients with oxaliplatin-refractory colorectal cancer.

Sung Yong Oh, Young-Tae Ju, Sang-Kyung Choi, Chang Yoon Ha, Won Sup Lee, Hoon Gu Kim, Gyeong-Won Lee, Hyuk-Chan Kwon, Jung Hun Kang

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Investigational new drugs, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 85% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sung Yong OhDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea.
Young-Tae Ju
Sang-Kyung Choi
Chang Yoon Ha
Won Sup Lee
Hoon Gu Kim
Gyeong-Won Lee
Hyuk-Chan Kwon
Jung Hun Kang
Gyeongsang National University · KRDong-A University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To determine the efficacy and tolerance of irinotecan in combination with S-1 (IRIS) for patients whose disease progressed after treatment with an oxaliplatin-based therapy for colorectal cancer (CRC). Each patient's disease had progressed after the administration of a regimen containing oxaliplatin and 5-FU. S-1 was administered orally at a fixed dose of 40 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 and 21-35. Irinotecan (150 mg/m(2)) was administered via intravenous infusion on days 1, 15, and 29. Courses were repeated every 6 weeks. 20 patients were enrolled in this study between April 2006 and March 2008. The median age was 63 years (range: 34-74), and the dominant metastasis sites were the liver, lung, and lymph nodes. The objective response rate was 20%; 1 patient registered complete response and 3 patients registered partial responses; 7 patients were stabilized (35%); and 9 evidenced progression of disease (45%). Median progression-free survival was 3.0 months (95% CI, 2.1-3.9 months) and median overall survival was 9.8 months (95% CI, 6.3-13.3 months). For the 41 cycles analyzed, the most commonly detected hematologic toxicity was grade I-II anemia (63.4%). Leukopenia occurred in 18 cycles (41.5%), including eight cycles (19.5%) of grade 3-4 leukopenia. Frequently observed non-hematologic toxicities included the following: grade I vomiting was reported in 4 patients (20%), grade 2 neuropathy occurred in 3 patients (15%), and grade 2 mucositis was noted in 2 patients (10%). Two patients died from sepsis and hematemesis during treatment. Although the response rate in stage I reached the target (≥ 3/18, p0 = 10%) established for movement to stage II, this study had to be discontinued because two patients died during treatment. Additionally, the follow-up loss rate was higher (16.6%) than we had anticipated (<10%). Even though a regime consisting of irinotecan combined with S-1 (IRIS) has proven effective in oxaliplatin-pretreated patients with advanced CRC, treatment-related mortalities and the high follow-up loss rate suggested that this IRIS protocol should result in early closure and modification.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, NeoplasmAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCamptothecinColorectal NeoplasmsDecision MakingDisease ProgressionDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug CombinationsFemaleHumansIrinotecanMaleMiddle AgedAntineoplastic AgentsCamptothecinDrug CombinationsIrinotecanOrganoplatinum CompoundsOxaliplatinOxonic AcidS 1 (combination)Tegafur

Identifiers

PMID20238142
OpenAlexW2080780468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.