Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20237964›Full record

ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2010

A biological global positioning system: considerations for tracking stem cell behaviors in the whole body.

Shengwen Calvin Li, Lisa May Ling Tachiki, Jane Luo, Brent A Dethlefs, Zhongping Chen, William G Loudon

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Functional endoscopy techniques for tracking stem cell fate.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Stem Cells and Labeling for Spinal Cord Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Shengwen Calvin LiCenter for Neuroscience and Stem Cell Research, Children's Hospital of Orange County Research Institute, University of California Irvine, 455 South Main Street, Orange, CA 92868, USA. shengwel@uci.edu
Lisa May Ling Tachiki
Jane Luo
Brent A Dethlefs
Zhongping Chen
William G Loudon
University of California, Irvine · USBeckman Coulter Foundation · USBeckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic · USChildren's Hospital of Orange County · USNeurological Surgery · US

Funding

WOUND MIGRATION FORCE MONITORINGP41RR001192 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LYUBOVITSKY, JULIA · 1985 to 2011
$14.2M
Optical Biopsy Using MEMs TechnologyR01CA091717 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI CHEN, ZHONGPING · 2002 to 2006
$2.9M
HIGH SPEED HIGH RESOLUTION PHASE RESOLVED OCT/ODTR01EB000293 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI CHEN, ZHONGPING · 2002 to 2009
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS CA 91717NCI NIH HHS R01 CA091717NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR001192NIBIB NIH HHS EB-00293NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB000293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many recent research studies have proposed stem cell therapy as a treatment for cancer, spinal cord injuries, brain damage, cardiovascular disease, and other conditions. Some of these experimental therapies have been tested in small animals and, in rare cases, in humans. Medical researchers anticipate extensive clinical applications of stem cell therapy in the future. The lack of basic knowledge concerning basic stem cell biology-survival, migration, differentiation, integration in a real time manner when transplanted into damaged CNS remains an absolute bottleneck for attempt to design stem cell therapies for CNS diseases. A major challenge to the development of clinical applied stem cell therapy in medical practice remains the lack of efficient stem cell tracking methods. As a result, the fate of the vast majority of stem cells transplanted in the human central nervous system (CNS), particularly in the detrimental effects, remains unknown. The paucity of knowledge concerning basic stem cell biology--survival, migration, differentiation, integration in real-time when transplanted into damaged CNS remains a bottleneck in the attempt to design stem cell therapies for CNS diseases. Even though excellent histological techniques remain as the gold standard, no good in vivo techniques are currently available to assess the transplanted graft for migration, differentiation, or survival. To address these issues, herein we propose strategies to investigate the lineage fate determination of derived human embryonic stem cells (hESC) transplanted in vivo into the CNS. Here, we describe a comprehensive biological Global Positioning System (bGPS) to track transplanted stem cells. But, first, we review, four currently used standard methods for tracking stem cells in vivo: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), bioluminescence imaging (BLI), positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and fluorescence imaging (FLI) with quantum dots. We summarize these modalities and propose criteria that can be employed to rank the practical usefulness for specific applications. Based on the results of this review, we argue that additional qualities are still needed to advance these modalities toward clinical applications. We then discuss an ideal procedure for labeling and tracking stem cells in vivo, finally, we present a novel imaging system based on our experiments.

Indexed as

HumansModels, BiologicalPositron-Emission TomographyQuantum DotsStem CellsWhole Body Imaging

Identifiers

PMID20237964
PMCPMC2887536
OpenAlexW2125961288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.