Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20237920›Full record

ArticleEuropean biophysics journal : EBJ2010

How to choose relevant multiple receptor conformations for virtual screening: a test case of Cdk2 and normal mode analysis.

Olivier Sperandio, Liliane Mouawad, Eulalie Pinto, Bruno O Villoutreix, David Perahia, Maria A Miteva

Abstract readLetter
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European biophysics journal : EBJ, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Receptor-ligand molecular docking.Biophysical reviews · 2014
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Protein flexibility in docking and surface mapping.Quarterly reviews of biophysics · 2012
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Olivier Sperandio
Liliane Mouawad
Eulalie Pinto
Bruno O Villoutreix
David Perahia
Maria A Miteva

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Better treatment of protein flexibility is essential in structure-based drug design projects such as virtual screening and protein-ligand docking. Diversity in ligand-binding mechanisms and receptor conformational changes makes it difficult to treat dynamic features of the receptor during the docking simulation. Thus, the use of pregenerated multiple receptor conformations is applied today in virtual screening studies. However, generation of a small relevant set of receptor conformations remains challenging. To address this problem, we propose a new protocol for the generation of multiple receptor conformations via normal mode analysis and for the selection of several receptor conformations suitable for docking/virtual screening. We validated this protocol on cyclin-dependent kinase 2, which possesses a binding site located at the interface between two subdomains and is known to undergo significant conformational changes in the active site region upon ligand binding. We believe that the suggested rules for the choice of suitable receptor conformations can be applied to other targets when dealing with in silico screening on flexible receptors.

Indexed as

User-Computer InterfaceCyclin-Dependent Kinase 2Drug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansModels, MolecularProtein ConformationProtein Kinase InhibitorsCyclin-Dependent Kinase 2Protein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.