ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2010
Clinicopathologic prognostic markers of survival: an analysis of 259 patients with malignant melanoma >or=1 mm.
Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The histopathologic status of the sentinel node (SN) and the ulceration of the primary tumor are important indicators of the clinical outcome of melanoma patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate potential correlations between prognostic factors and the sentinel lymph node status as well as their influence on disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastases-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS). The medical records of 259 melanoma patients who underwent sentinel lymph node dissection between 2000 and 2006 were analyzed. DFS, DMFS, and OS were assessed. A uni- and a multivariate analysis to determine prognostic factors were performed. Histologic type, Clark's level, and Breslow's tumor thickness were the only parameters that showed a significant correlation with a positive SN. The univariate analysis revealed SN positivity (DFS and DMFS: p < 0.001; OS: p = 0.039) and ulceration (DFS: p < 0.001; DMFS: p = 0.001; OS: p = 0.003) to be significant prognostic markers. However, ulceration was the only independent prognostic factor for OS that was upheld by the multivariate analysis (p = 0.006; HR 3.89; CI 1.48-10.27). In stage I/II melanoma patients, ulceration of the primary tumor was the strongest prognostic factor for RFS, DMFS, and OS and superior to the pathology status of the SN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20237897What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.