Trial reportJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2010
High-flow nasal cannula and extubation success in the premature infant: a comparison of two modalities.
Trial report in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Nasal high flow therapy for primary respiratory support in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Review
- Nasal high flow treatment in preterm infants.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2017Review
- Respiratory support with heated humidified high flow nasal cannula in preterm infants.Korean journal of pediatrics · 2016Review
- Work of breathing indices in infants with respiratory insufficiency receiving high-flow nasal cannula and nasal continuous positive airway pressure.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2014Article
- A randomized controlled trial to compare heated humidified high-flow nasal cannulae with nasal continuous positive airway pressure postextubation in premature infants.Journal of clinical neonatology · 2013Article
- Use of high flow nasal cannula in critically ill infants, children, and adults: a critical review of the literature.Intensive care medicine · 2013Review
- CPAP review.European journal of pediatrics · 2012Review
- Post-extubation atelectasis in newborns with surgical diseases: a report of two cases involving the use of a high-flow nasal cannula.Revista Brasileira de terapia intensivaArticle
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the effectiveness of Fisher and Paykel (FP) and Vapotherm (VT) high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in preventing reintubation either within 72 h or <7 days after extubation of premature infants. The primary outcome was the rate of extubation failure defined as reintubation within 72 h. Secondary outcomes included reintubation after ≤7 days. STUDY
designThis was a prospective, randomized pilot study comparing the extubation success of 40 infants born between 26 and 29 weeks of gestation.
resultThe rate of extubation failure at 72 h was 18% for FP and 9% for VT. The failure rate ≤7 days after extubation was 30% for FP and 27% for VT. None of these differences were statistically significant.
conclusionThere was no difference between FP and VT in the extubation success of infants born between 26 and 29 weeks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20237485What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.