Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20237253›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2010

The path to open-angle glaucoma gene discovery: endophenotypic status of intraocular pressure, cup-to-disc ratio, and central corneal thickness.

Jac Charlesworth, Patricia L Kramer, Tom Dyer, Victor Diego, John R Samples, Jamie E Craig, David A Mackey, Alex W Hewitt, John Blangero, Mary K Wirtz

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Association ofMolecular vision · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The GGLEAM Study: Understanding Glaucoma in the Ohio Amish.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jac CharlesworthDepartment of Genetics, Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Patricia L Kramer
Tom Dyer
Victor Diego
John R Samples
Jamie E Craig
David A Mackey
Alex W Hewitt
John Blangero
Mary K Wirtz
Texas Biomedical Research Institute · USOregon Health & Science University · USCentre for Eye Research Australia · AUFlinders University · AULions Eye Institute · AU

Funding

Proteomics CoreP30EY010572 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI TED S ACOTT · 1995 to 2026
$19.4M
Quantitative Trait Locus Mapping in Human PedigreesR37MH059490 · NIMH · TEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BLANGERO, JOHN · 2001 to 2010
$6.8M
GENETICS OF ADULT-ONSET PRIMARY OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMAR01EY011650 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI WIRTZ, MARY K · 1997 to 2014
$5.0M
PROTEOGLYCANS AND INHERITANCE OF OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMAR01EY010555 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI WIRTZ, MARY K · 1994 to 2010
$3.3M
QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS MAPPING IN HUMAN PEDIGREESR01MH059490 · NIMH · SOUTHWEST FOUNDATION FOR BIOMEDICAL RES · PI BLANGERO, JOHN · 1998 to 2000
$426k
NEI NIH HHS EY010572NEI NIH HHS EY10555NEI NIH HHS EY11650NEI NIH HHS P30 EY010572NEI NIH HHS R01 EY010555NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011650NIMH NIH HHS MH059490NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH059490NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH059490
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PURPOSE. Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is a complex disease with a genetic architecture that can be simplified through the investigation of individual traits underlying disease risk. It has been well studied in twin models, and this study was undertaken to investigate the heritability of some of these key endophenotypes in extended pedigrees. METHODS. These data are derived from a large, multicenter study of extended, Caucasian POAG families from Australia and the United States. The study included 1181 people from 22 extended pedigrees. Variance components modeling was used to determine the heritabilities of maximum intraocular pressure (IOP), maximum vertical cup-to-disc ratio (VCDR), and mean central corneal thickness (CCT). Bivariate quantitative genetic analysis between these eye-related phenotypes and POAG itself was performed to determine whether any of these traits represent true endophenotypes. RESULTS. Heritability estimates for IOP, VCDR, and CCT (0.42, 0.66, and 0.72, respectively) were significant and show strong concordance with data in previous studies. Bivariate analysis revealed that both IOP (RhoG = 0.80; P = 9.6 x 10(-6)) and VCDR (RhoG = 0.76; P = 4.8 x 10(-10)) showed strong evidence of genetic correlation with POAG susceptibility. These two traits also correlated genetically with each other (RhoG = 0.45; P = 0.0012). Alternatively, CCT did not correlate genetically with risk of POAG. CONCLUSIONS. All the proposed POAG-related traits have genetic components. However, the significant genetic correlations observed between IOP, VCDR, and POAG itself suggest that they most likely represent true endophenotypes that could aid in the identification of genes underlying POAG susceptibility. CCT did not correlate genetically with disease and is unlikely to be a useful surrogate endophenotype for POAG.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseCorneaFemaleGenetic Association StudiesGenetic LinkageGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedNerve FibersOptic DiskPedigreePhenotypeRetinal Ganglion CellsRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID20237253
PMCPMC2904007
OpenAlexW2078528120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.