Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20237082›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2010

Coinfecting prion strains compete for a limiting cellular resource.

Ronald A Shikiya, Jacob I Ayers, Charles R Schutt, Anthony E Kincaid, Jason C Bartz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Multiple aspects of amyloid dynamicsFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The role of prion strain diversity in the development of successful therapeutic treatments.Progress in molecular biology and translational science · 2020
    Review
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ronald A ShikiyaDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Creighton University, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE 68178, USA.
Jacob I Ayers
Charles R Schutt
Anthony E Kincaid
Jason C Bartz
Creighton University · US

Funding

Mechanisms of prion strain selectionR01NS052609 · NINDS · CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY · PI BARTZ, JASON C · 2006 to 2015
$3.2M
CONSTRUCTION OF RESEARCH FACILITYC06RR017417 · NCRR · CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY · PI WILSON, M. ROY · 2002 to 2002
$2.0M
Replacing an Animal Resource Facility Cage Washer.G20RR024001 · NCRR · CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY · PI DRESCHER, KRISTEN · 2007 to 2007
$638k
NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR017417NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR17417-01NCRR NIH HHS G20 RR024001NCRR NIH HHS G20RR024001NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR0115635-6NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS052609
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prion strain interference can influence the emergence of a dominant strain from a mixture; however, the mechanisms underlying prion strain interference are poorly understood. In our model of strain interference, inoculation of the sciatic nerve with the drowsy (DY) strain of the transmissible mink encephalopathy (TME) agent prior to superinfection with the hyper (HY) strain of TME can completely block HY TME from causing disease. We show here that the deposition of PrP(Sc), in the absence of neuronal loss or spongiform change, in the central nervous system corresponds with the ability of DY TME to block HY TME infection. This suggests that DY TME agent-induced damage is not responsible for strain interference but rather prions compete for a cellular resource. We show that protein misfolding cyclic amplification (PMCA) of DY and HY TME maintains the strain-specific properties of PrP(Sc) and replicates infectious agent and that DY TME can interfere, or completely block, the emergence of HY TME. DY PrP(Sc) does not convert all of the available PrP(C) to PrP(Sc) in PMCA, suggesting the mechanism of prion strain interference is due to the sequestering of PrP(C) and/or other cellular components required for prion conversion. The emergence of HY TME in PMCA was controlled by the initial ratio of the TME agents. A higher ratio of DY to HY TME agent is required for complete blockage of HY TME in PMCA compared to several previous in vivo studies, suggesting that HY TME persists in animals coinfected with the two strains. This was confirmed by PMCA detection of HY PrP(Sc) in animals where DY TME had completely blocked HY TME from causing disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsCricetinaeMinkPrion DiseasesPrionsProtein FoldingPrPSc ProteinsSciatic NerveSpecies SpecificityPrionsPrPSc Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20237082
PMCPMC2876617
OpenAlexW1968142614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.