Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20237055›Full record

Trial reportNephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association2010

Bismuth coating of non-tunneled haemodialysis catheters reduces bacterial colonization: a randomized controlled trial.

Ralf Schindler, Uwe Heemann, Ulrike Haug, Benjamin Stoelck, Aysun Karatas, Cosima Pohle, Reinhold Deppisch, Werner Beck, Markus Hollenbeck

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. SiOFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  2. Clinical and Regulatory Considerations for Central Venous Catheters for Hemodialysis.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2018
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. [Central venous catheters as access for acute and long-term dialysis].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2012
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ralf SchindlerDepartment of Nephrology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité-Virchow-Klinikum, Universitaetsmedizin zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany. ralf.schindler@charite.de
Uwe Heemann
Ulrike Haug
Benjamin Stoelck
Aysun Karatas
Cosima Pohle
Reinhold Deppisch
Werner Beck
Markus Hollenbeck

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHaemodialysis (HD) catheter-related blood stream infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with acute and chronic renal failure.

methodsWe conducted a randomized, prospective, double-blinded trial investigating the clinical value of bismuth-coated non-tunneled HD catheters in patients in need of temporary short-term vascular access. A standard catheter (SC) was compared to a surface-modified, bismuth-film-coated catheter (FCC). After removal of the catheter for any reason, both arterial and venous lumina were rinsed and the fluid cultured for detection of bacterial colony-forming units (CFU). The catheter tip was placed in a tube containing sterile saline, sonicated and shortly centrifuged to remove debris (3 min at 1000 g). The supernatant was cultured and assayed for DNA content.

resultsSeventy-seven patients in three HD units were randomized. Thirteen patients suffered from acute renal failure, 60 patients from chronic renal failure, and four patients without renal insufficiency were treated with plasma exchange. The time to catheter removal was not significantly different between groups, with a mean of 18.5 +/- 2 days for SC and 15.1 +/- 2 days for FCC. In most cases, the reasons for catheter removal were related to no further need for extracorporeal therapy or establishment of a permanent vascular access. Six catheters for SC and four catheters for FCC were removed because of presumed infection. Bacterial colonization was significantly lower for coated catheters compared to standard catheters, both for cultured catheter tips as well as for CFU in rinse fluids (P < 0.05).

conclusionsSurface modification with bismuth film reduces bacterial colonization of temporary non-tunneled HD catheters in a clinical trial. Larger trials with these modified catheters are justified to further investigate the effect on catheter-related infections, complications and costs.

Indexed as

BismuthBacterial InfectionsCatheter-Related InfectionsCatheters, IndwellingColony-Forming Units AssayDouble-Blind MethodEquipment ContaminationFemaleHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRenal DialysisTreatment OutcomeBismuth

Identifiers

PMID20237055
PMCPMC2905443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.